Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QILGX vs RGEBX
QILGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts QILGX vs RGEBX
QILGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QILGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QILGX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. QILGX (5.67B). QILGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . QILGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: QILGX (21 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than QILGX (0.87). QILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QILGX: RGEBX (250) vs QILGX (1000000). QILGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. RGEBX (5.16). QILGX return over 5 years is better than : 37.96 vs. RGEBX (12.23).
| QILGX | RGEBX | QILGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.08 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.216 | 7.631 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.67B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.15 | 5.16 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.84 | 40.43 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.96 | 12.23 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 199.86 | 101.11 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement