QLD
Price
$89.12
Change
-$2.65 (-2.89%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
13.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TECL
Price
$198.99
Change
-$11.66 (-5.54%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
5.79B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD vs TECL

QLD vs TECL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL)

Key Takeaways

  • ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) delivers 2x daily exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, providing broad large-cap growth equity coverage across technology and other sectors.
  • Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) offers 3x daily exposure exclusively to the Technology Select Sector Index, resulting in higher leverage and narrower sector concentration.
  • Both ETFs employ leveraged strategies using derivatives, leading to higher expense ratios (0.95% for QLD and 0.87% for TECL) compared to unleveraged peers and increased volatility over time.
  • QLD tracks approximately 100 holdings with significant overlap in top positions such as NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), while TECL focuses on roughly 70 technology names with even greater weighting toward the same leaders.
  • TECL exhibits greater sensitivity to technology sector rotations and earnings cycles due to its 3x multiplier and pure-play focus, whereas QLD benefits from modest diversification outside pure technology.
  • Both funds are designed for short-term trading horizons rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies because of daily reset mechanics and compounding effects in volatile markets.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) represent two distinct leveraged approaches to equity market exposure. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer alternative strategies for investors seeking amplified returns from growth-oriented segments. QLD provides double daily exposure to a broad large-cap growth index, while TECL triples daily exposure to a concentrated technology sector index. This comparison highlights structural differences that matter for investors evaluating risk-adjusted positioning within technology-driven market environments.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund primarily uses swaps and other derivatives to achieve its leveraged objective rather than holding the underlying securities directly. It maintains approximately 126 holdings when including derivatives exposure, with the top 10 positions representing roughly 38% of assets. Prominent holdings include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN), and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Sector allocations tilt heavily toward technology but include consumer discretionary and communication services exposure through the Nasdaq-100 composition. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a passive leveraged ETF, it resets exposure daily, making it suitable for tactical, short-term use within broader growth equity strategies.

Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) Overview

Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. The fund employs swaps, futures, and other derivatives to deliver its target leverage. It features around 73 holdings including derivatives, with the top 10 accounting for approximately 66% of assets. Leading positions center on NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Allocations concentrate entirely within the technology sector. The expense ratio is 0.87%. This passive leveraged structure resets daily and provides amplified exposure to technology-specific performance drivers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to influence broader equity markets through innovation cycles in semiconductors, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence. Capital flows have favored companies with strong earnings growth in these areas during recent market cycles. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate capital expenditure trends affect both funds. Regulatory developments around data privacy and antitrust remain relevant for large technology constituents. Sector risks include elevated valuations and potential slowdowns in spending if economic conditions weaken. Both ETFs operate within this environment where technology leadership drives overall market sentiment over extended periods.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both funds have reflected amplified movements tied to technology earnings seasons and broader growth equity rotations. TECL’s higher leverage has produced greater volatility relative to QLD during periods of sector strength or weakness. QLD’s broader Nasdaq-100 exposure has provided modest buffering from non-technology holdings during rotations away from pure technology. Performance differences stem primarily from the leverage multiplier and index composition rather than isolated events. Over multiple market cycles, the daily reset mechanism has led to varying outcomes depending on trend consistency and volatility levels, with TECL showing higher sensitivity to technology-specific momentum.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into leveraged ETFs and sector opportunities may find the platform useful for refining their screening process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including cost efficiency, diversification profile, and sector momentum consistency, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Its 2x leverage combined with broader Nasdaq-100 exposure offers a balanced risk profile relative to TECL’s higher 3x multiplier and concentrated technology focus, particularly when considering volatility and compounding effects across varied market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QLD vs. TECL commentary
Jun 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and TECL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.4B vs. TECL (5.79B). TECL has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: TECL (69.692) vs QLD (26.684). QLD was incepted earlier than TECL: QLD (20 years) vs TECL (18 years). TECL (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than QLD (0.95). TECL has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
QLDTECLQLD / TECL
Gain YTD26.68469.69238%
Net Assets13.4B5.79B231%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.87109%
Turnover16.0094.0017%
Yield0.123.404%
Fund Existence20 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDTECL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TECL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGRO24.940.22
+0.90%
VIRTUS SILVANT GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES ETF
HYMB25.390.02
+0.08%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Nuveen ICE HY Muncpl ETF
LIAU259.75N/A
N/A
LifeX 2060 Infl-Prt Longevity Income ETF
FRA10.84-0.03
-0.28%
Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund
BABX13.52-0.08
-0.59%
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-2.89%
LRCX - QLD
73%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
NVDA - QLD
70%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
KLAC - QLD
70%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
MU - QLD
68%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
ASML - QLD
67%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
More

TECL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TECL has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TECL jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TECL
1D Price
Change %
TECL100%
-5.54%
NVDA - TECL
73%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
LRCX - TECL
73%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
MU - TECL
71%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
AMD - TECL
70%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
AVGO - TECL
69%
Closely correlated
-3.67%
More