Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLD vs UWM
QLD vs UWM Comparison
Open Charts QLD vs UWM
QLD vs UWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLD vs. UWM commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and UWM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 12.8B vs. UWM (232M). UWM has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: UWM (34.039) vs QLD (18.937). QLD was incepted earlier than UWM: QLD (20 years) vs UWM (20 years). QLD (0.95) and UWM (0.95) have comparable expense ratios . UWM has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
| QLD | UWM | QLD / UWM | |
| Gain YTD | 18.937 | 34.039 | 56% |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 232M | 5,517% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 100% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 66.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 0.14 | 0.84 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLD | UWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FXA | 69.73 | 0.09 | +0.13% |
| Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust | |||
| VSDB | 75.96 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF | |||
| BLST | 24.80 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | |||
| FLCB | 21.05 | -0.07 | -0.31% |
| Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF | |||
| XSVN | 46.45 | -0.17 | -0.36% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF | |||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| KLAC - QLD | 72% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| MU - QLD | 70% Closely correlated | -5.90% | ||
| ADI - QLD | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SWKS - QLD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||
UWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UWM has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UWM jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWM | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| FIX - UWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| ONTO - UWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| SMCI - UWM | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.42% | ||
| ELF - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| MSTR - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | -4.56% |