Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLD vs UWM
QLD vs UWM Comparison
Open Charts QLD vs UWM
QLD vs UWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLD vs. UWM commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Buy and UWM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.9B vs. UWM (231M). UWM has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: UWM (30.649) vs QLD (27.295). QLD was incepted earlier than UWM: QLD (20 years) vs UWM (20 years). QLD (0.95) and UWM (0.95) have comparable expense ratios . UWM has a higher turnover QLD (23.00) vs QLD (23.00).
| QLD | UWM | QLD / UWM | |
| Gain YTD | 27.295 | 30.649 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 231M | 6,017% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 100% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 48.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 0.13 | 0.83 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLD | UWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +1.74% | ||
| SWKS - QLD | 61% Loosely correlated | +5.14% | ||
| ZM - QLD | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| DOCU - QLD | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| ALGN - QLD | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| OKTA - QLD | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.69% | ||
More | ||||
UWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UWM has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UWM jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWM | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| FIX - UWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +6.29% | ||
| ONTO - UWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.59% | ||
| SMCI - UWM | 30% Poorly correlated | +7.28% | ||
| ELF - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| MSTR - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.87% |