QLD
Price
$89.12
Change
-$2.65 (-2.89%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
13.67B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YINN
Price
$21.45
Change
-$0.27 (-1.24%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
504.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD vs YINN

QLD vs YINN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN)

Key Takeaways

  • ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, concentrating on large-cap U.S. technology and growth stocks, while Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) provides 3x daily leveraged exposure to the FTSE China 50 Index, focusing on major Chinese equities.
  • Both ETFs employ leveraged strategies that amplify daily returns and volatility, but they target distinct geographic and sector exposures with no direct overlap in underlying holdings or benchmarks.
  • QLD maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.95% compared to YINN’s 1.34%, reflecting differences in leverage level and the complexity of tracking their respective indices.
  • QLD typically holds a concentrated portfolio of 100 Nasdaq-100 components with heavy technology sector weighting, whereas YINN tracks approximately 50 large Chinese companies across financials, consumer, and technology sectors.
  • Structural differences in leverage (2x versus 3x), rebalancing frequency, and compounding effects create divergent risk profiles suited to distinct investor objectives in U.S. growth versus emerging-market China exposure.
  • These ETFs serve as tactical tools rather than core holdings, appealing to investors seeking amplified short-term sector or thematic exposure within broader market strategies.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) represent two distinct leveraged exchange-traded funds that allow investors to pursue amplified exposure to high-growth U.S. technology and Chinese equity markets, respectively. These ETFs do not compete directly but instead offer alternative leveraged strategies for investors targeting different geographic regions and thematic drivers. In the current environment of evolving U.S.-China relations, interest-rate expectations, and sector rotations, comparing their structural characteristics helps clarify how each fits into diversified portfolios seeking either domestic innovation leadership or international emerging-market opportunities.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund employs a passive leveraged strategy using swaps, futures, and other derivatives to achieve its objective, with daily rebalancing to maintain the target leverage. It typically holds a concentrated set of approximately 100 large-cap, non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq, dominated by technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services sectors. Top holdings generally include major technology leaders such as NVIDIA Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc., and Meta Platforms Inc. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a leveraged product, QLD resets exposure daily, leading to potential compounding effects over longer periods that differ from simple 2x returns.

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) Overview

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the FTSE China 50 Index. The fund uses a passive leveraged approach with derivatives to deliver the target multiple, requiring daily rebalancing. It provides exposure to roughly 50 of the largest and most liquid Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Sector allocations commonly emphasize financials, consumer staples and discretionary, energy, and technology. Representative holdings often feature major Chinese firms such as Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Meituan, and leading banks. The expense ratio is 1.34%. YINN’s higher leverage level amplifies both gains and losses relative to its benchmark on a daily basis.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The comparison occurs against a backdrop of contrasting macroeconomic and geopolitical influences on U.S. technology and Chinese equity markets. U.S. large-cap growth stocks benefit from innovation cycles in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductors, supported by domestic capital flows and earnings resilience. Chinese equities face variables including regulatory developments, property-sector dynamics, export demand, and broader U.S.-China trade relations. Capital flows into technology themes remain robust in the United States, while China exposure reflects periodic policy stimulus and global supply-chain shifts. Both markets respond to interest-rate expectations and global risk sentiment, though with differing sensitivities due to their distinct economic drivers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has exhibited performance closely tied to U.S. technology earnings momentum and sector rotation favoring growth equities. Its 2x leverage magnifies daily moves in the Nasdaq-100 while maintaining relatively high liquidity. Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN), with its 3x leverage, shows greater sensitivity to China-specific catalysts such as policy announcements and commodity trends, resulting in elevated volatility compared with U.S.-focused leveraged products. Relative positioning highlights QLD’s alignment with established U.S. innovation leadership versus YINN’s exposure to emerging-market recovery themes. Over multiple weeks and months, differences in leverage and underlying index composition drive distinct risk-adjusted behaviors during periods of sector rotation or macroeconomic shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The reasoning centers on its lower expense ratio, exposure to a concentrated group of high-quality U.S. technology leaders with consistent earnings momentum, and comparatively moderate leverage level that may support more stable trend consistency within established market leadership. YINN’s higher leverage and emerging-market concentration introduce greater sensitivity to geopolitical and policy variables. Investors should evaluate these characteristics against individual risk tolerance and time horizon.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QLD vs. YINN commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and YINN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.7B vs. YINN (505M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than YINN: QLD (26.684) vs YINN (-49.123). QLD was incepted earlier than YINN: QLD (20 years) vs YINN (17 years). QLD (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than YINN (1.34). YINN has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
QLDYINNQLD / YINN
Gain YTD26.684-49.123-54%
Net Assets13.7B505M2,713%
Total Expense Ratio0.951.3471%
Turnover16.00147.0011%
Yield0.121.458%
Fund Existence20 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDYINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PXGOX17.340.05
+0.29%
Impax Global Opportunities Institutional
HRCAX110.59N/A
N/A
Harbor Capital Appreciation Admin
DNLAX54.65N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Natural Resources A
ETCGX54.22N/A
N/A
Eventide Gilead C
CDOFX53.67N/A
N/A
Crawford Small Cap Dividend

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-2.89%
LRCX - QLD
73%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
NVDA - QLD
70%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
KLAC - QLD
68%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
MU - QLD
67%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
ASML - QLD
67%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
More