QLD
Price
$94.15
Change
-$0.28 (-0.30%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Net Assets
14.53B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YINN
Price
$28.16
Change
+$0.08 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
652.05M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD vs YINN

QLD vs YINN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN)

Key Takeaways

  • ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) provides 2x daily leveraged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, emphasizing U.S. technology and growth-oriented large-cap stocks, while Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the FTSE China 50 Index, focusing on major Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong.
  • QLD maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.95% compared to YINN’s 1.34%, offering relative cost efficiency for investors seeking amplified U.S. equity exposure.
  • Both ETFs are leveraged products that seek daily investment results before fees and expenses, employing derivatives such as swaps and futures, which introduce compounding effects and heightened volatility over multi-day periods.
  • QLD offers broader diversification across approximately 100 holdings with heavy weighting in technology sectors, whereas YINN concentrates on roughly 50 large-cap Chinese names across financials, consumer, and technology sectors.
  • The structural differences position QLD for investors targeting U.S. innovation-driven growth and YINN for those seeking tactical exposure to Chinese equity market cycles and macroeconomic developments in Asia.
  • Both funds exhibit elevated risk profiles due to leverage, making them suitable primarily for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) represent distinct leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) strategies that appeal to investors pursuing amplified returns in different geographic markets. These ETFs do not compete directly for the same benchmark but offer alternative pathways to sector and regional exposure—QLD targeting U.S. large-cap technology and growth equities through the Nasdaq-100, and YINN providing leveraged access to leading Chinese companies. Investors may compare them when evaluating tactical allocations amid shifting global growth dynamics, U.S. versus emerging market rotations, or varying risk appetites for daily-reset leveraged products.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is a leveraged ETF issued by ProShares that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Nasdaq-100 Index comprises the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, with significant concentration in technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services sectors. The fund typically holds a combination of securities, derivatives, and money market instruments to achieve its leverage target and maintains around 100 to 112 holdings. Top holdings often include major names such as NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corp., reflecting the index’s emphasis on innovative growth companies. QLD carries a net expense ratio of 0.95% and operates as a passively managed, non-diversified leveraged product with daily rebalancing to reset exposure.

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) Overview

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) is a leveraged ETF issued by Direxion that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times (3x) the daily performance of the FTSE China 50 Index. This index tracks the 50 largest and most liquid Chinese companies trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The fund primarily utilizes swaps, derivatives, and other financial instruments to attain its leveraged exposure and typically features a small number of direct holdings supplemented by index-tracking components. Prominent positions include Tencent Holdings, China Construction Bank, and Alibaba Group, spanning financials, consumer, and technology sectors. YINN maintains a net expense ratio of 1.34% and functions as a passively managed, non-diversified leveraged product with daily rebalancing.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The comparison occurs against a backdrop of divergent global equity themes, with U.S. technology leadership driven by artificial intelligence innovation and semiconductor demand contrasting with China’s large-cap equity market influenced by regulatory policies, domestic consumption trends, and geopolitical factors. Capital flows into U.S. growth sectors have remained resilient amid earnings strength in key technology firms, while Chinese equities have experienced periodic volatility tied to policy announcements and macroeconomic indicators. Both leveraged ETFs amplify participation in their respective regional cycles, exposing investors to sector-specific momentum in technology and financials alongside broader interest rate expectations and trade dynamics.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, QLD has benefited from sustained strength in U.S. technology earnings and sector rotation toward growth equities, delivering amplified daily moves consistent with its 2x Nasdaq-100 mandate. YINN’s performance has reflected fluctuations in Chinese large-cap equities, influenced by commodity trends, banking sector stability, and shifts in investor sentiment toward emerging markets. Relative positioning highlights QLD’s lower leverage multiple alongside greater diversification within a single high-growth index, versus YINN’s higher 3x leverage applied to a more concentrated international benchmark. Volatility differences arise from the underlying market characteristics, with both products exhibiting pronounced sensitivity to short-term macro shifts and sector-specific catalysts rather than isolated price events.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like QLD and YINN may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification within a high-momentum U.S. benchmark, and consistent sector exposure to technology leaders, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) for investors seeking leveraged equity exposure aligned with established growth trends, while recognizing YINN’s distinct role for targeted China market participation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QLD vs. YINN commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Buy and YINN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 14.5B vs. YINN (652M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than YINN: QLD (33.834) vs YINN (-33.374). QLD was incepted earlier than YINN: QLD (20 years) vs YINN (17 years). QLD (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than YINN (1.34). YINN has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
QLDYINNQLD / YINN
Gain YTD33.834-33.374-101%
Net Assets14.5B652M2,224%
Total Expense Ratio0.951.3471%
Turnover16.00147.0011%
Yield0.141.1712%
Fund Existence20 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDYINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSG11.370.15
+1.34%
ProShares UltraShort Semiconductors
XMVM75.770.26
+0.35%
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momt ETF
FRDM68.41-0.04
-0.06%
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
MTRA27.39-0.08
-0.30%
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF
TSYW41.22-0.35
-0.85%
Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF