QLD
Price
$84.15
Change
-$0.85 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:48 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YINN
Price
$27.91
Change
+$0.50 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:55 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
659.26M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD vs YINN

QLD vs YINN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN)

Key Takeaways

  • ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) delivers 2x daily exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, emphasizing large-cap U.S. technology and growth companies, while Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) provides 3x daily exposure to the FTSE China 50 Index, focusing on major Chinese equities.
  • Both ETFs employ leveraged strategies using derivatives such as swaps, resulting in higher volatility and the need for daily rebalancing compared to unleveraged index funds.
  • QLD maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.95% versus YINN’s 1.34%, offering a cost advantage for investors seeking amplified U.S. equity exposure.
  • QLD benefits from broader diversification across approximately 100 holdings dominated by technology sectors, whereas YINN concentrates on roughly 50 large Chinese companies with significant weight in financials and consumer sectors.
  • Structural differences position QLD for investors targeting U.S. innovation-driven markets and YINN for those seeking leveraged access to China’s economic cycles and policy developments.
  • Liquidity profiles favor QLD with higher average trading volumes, supporting tighter spreads for frequent rebalancing or tactical allocations.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) represent distinct leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) strategies that appeal to investors seeking amplified exposure to major equity markets. These funds do not compete directly in the same underlying index but offer alternative pathways to pursue growth in technology-heavy U.S. equities versus large-cap Chinese stocks. The comparison highlights differences in leverage levels, geographic focus, cost structures, and risk characteristics that help investors align selections with broader portfolio objectives amid evolving global market conditions.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The ETF uses a leveraged strategy primarily through total return swaps and other derivatives to achieve its target exposure. It holds a portfolio of approximately 114 positions, with top holdings including leading technology companies such as NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Micron Technology Inc. Sector allocations concentrate heavily in technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a passive leveraged product, it resets exposure daily, which suits short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold approaches.

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) Overview

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) aims for daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times (3x) the daily performance of the FTSE China 50 Index. The fund achieves this through swaps, securities, and other instruments tied to the index of the 50 largest and most liquid Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. It maintains exposure across roughly 50 core holdings, with top positions including Tencent Holdings, China Construction Bank, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. Allocations emphasize financials, consumer sectors, and technology within the Chinese market. The expense ratio is 1.34%. Like other daily-reset leveraged ETFs, it requires active monitoring due to compounding effects over multiple periods.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within leveraged equity segments influenced by macroeconomic factors, sector rotation, and geopolitical developments. U.S. technology leadership drives interest in Nasdaq-100 exposure, supported by innovation cycles and earnings momentum in artificial intelligence and semiconductors. Chinese large-cap equities respond to domestic policy measures, regulatory shifts, and global trade dynamics. Capital flows into emerging markets and interest rate expectations can affect relative attractiveness. Risks include currency fluctuations for YINN and valuation pressures in high-growth U.S. sectors for QLD. These themes underscore the ETFs’ roles as tactical tools rather than core long-term holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has exhibited amplified movements aligned with Nasdaq-100 trends, benefiting from strength in U.S. technology leaders during periods of growth-oriented sentiment. Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) has shown greater sensitivity to China-specific catalysts such as stimulus announcements and export trends, resulting in distinct volatility patterns. Relative positioning favors QLD for investors prioritizing U.S. equity momentum and lower costs, while YINN offers higher leverage for those focused on China recovery themes. Both demonstrate elevated volatility inherent to leveraged structures, with performance diverging based on geographic and sectoral drivers rather than isolated price fluctuations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification within a high-growth U.S. index, and established liquidity profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) for investors seeking leveraged equity exposure. YINN’s higher leverage and China-specific risks present a more concentrated profile suited to targeted tactical allocations. This assessment draws from cost efficiency, diversification characteristics, and trend consistency without constituting investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QLD vs. YINN commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and YINN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.3B vs. YINN (659M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than YINN: QLD (20.827) vs YINN (-34.987). QLD was incepted earlier than YINN: QLD (20 years) vs YINN (17 years). QLD (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than YINN (1.34). YINN has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
QLDYINNQLD / YINN
Gain YTD20.827-34.987-60%
Net Assets13.3B659M2,018%
Total Expense Ratio0.951.3471%
Turnover16.00147.0011%
Yield0.121.777%
Fund Existence20 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDYINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSCKX20.46N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc C
DDDIX26.73N/A
N/A
13D Activist I
HIEMX7.65N/A
N/A
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity I
MTINX25.66-0.19
-0.74%
NYLI Income Builder Investor Class
CUSUX20.11-0.19
-0.94%
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-3.72%
SWKS - QLD
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.26%
ZM - QLD
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
AMZN - QLD
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.57%
DOCU - QLD
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
ALGN - QLD
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
More