Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTIX vs RGWBX
QNTIX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTIX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Institutional
Price$36.29
Change+$0.30 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.22M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.67
Change+$0.19 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.74B
QNTIX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTIX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTIX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. QNTIX (37.2M). QNTIX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTIX (1.08) vs RGWBX (0.00). QNTIX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTIX (9 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTIX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTIX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTIX (1000000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. QNTIX (-7.57). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.59 vs. QNTIX (23.96).
| QNTIX | RGWBX | QNTIX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.930 | 5.464 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.2M | 21.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.57 | 7.90 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.85 | 25.88 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.96 | 36.59 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement