Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTIX vs RGWBX
QNTIX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTIX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Institutional
Price$38.08
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.77M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.23B
QNTIX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTIX vs. RGWBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTIX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. QNTIX (38.8M). QNTIX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTIX (0.92) vs RGWBX (0.00). QNTIX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTIX (9 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTIX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTIX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTIX (1000000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.46 vs. QNTIX (2.70). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.31 vs. QNTIX (33.06).
| QNTIX | RGWBX | QNTIX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.000 | 11.257 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.8M | 23.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.70 | 18.46 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.60 | 32.99 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.06 | 35.31 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement