Ad is loading...
QNTIX vs RGWBX
QNTIX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTIX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Institutional
Price$32.25
Change+$0.57 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.97M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$22.23
Change+$0.38 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.58B
QNTIX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTIX vs. RGWBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTIX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 18.6B vs. QNTIX (33M). QNTIX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTIX (1.14) vs RGWBX (0.00). QNTIX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTIX (8 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTIX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTIX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTIX (1000000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.48 vs. QNTIX (-16.56). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.45 vs. QNTIX (32.53).
| QNTIX | RGWBX | QNTIX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.516 | -8.669 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33M | 18.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.56 | -5.48 | 302% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.80 | 1.13 | -1,042% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.53 | 38.45 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers