QQEW
Price
$153.12
Change
-$3.26 (-2.08%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VEGN
Price
$78.74
Change
-$2.76 (-3.39%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:45 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
189.66M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQEW vs VEGN

QQEW vs VEGN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) vs. US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN)

Key Takeaways

  • First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) provides equal-weighted exposure to 50 high-quality growth companies selected from the Nasdaq-100 Index, while US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) tracks a market-cap-weighted index of approximately 250 U.S. large-cap stocks screened for vegan and climate-conscious criteria.
  • QQEW features a lower expense ratio of 0.55% compared to VEGN’s 0.60%, offering a modest cost advantage for long-term investors.
  • Both ETFs maintain heavy allocations to technology but differ in diversification: QQEW emphasizes balanced sector exposure within its select universe, whereas VEGN applies strict exclusions on animal agriculture, fossil fuels, and related industries.
  • QQEW’s equal-weight methodology reduces concentration risk relative to traditional market-cap approaches, while VEGN’s thematic screens introduce unique environmental, social, and governance (ESG) constraints that may affect holdings and volatility profiles.
  • Investors seeking broad Nasdaq growth with factor tilts may prefer QQEW, whereas those prioritizing alignment with vegan and climate values may find VEGN better suited despite its narrower eligible universe.
  • Structural differences in index construction, rebalancing frequency, and exclusion policies drive distinct risk-return characteristics suitable for varying investor objectives within large-cap growth strategies.

Introduction

Investors evaluating large-cap growth exposure often compare funds with overlapping technology tilts but divergent construction methodologies. First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) both target U.S. equities with significant technology allocations yet pursue distinct objectives. QQEW applies equal weighting and quality-growth selection within the Nasdaq-100 universe, while VEGN implements market-cap weighting with comprehensive vegan and climate-related exclusions. These differences make the pair relevant for investors seeking either factor-enhanced Nasdaq exposure or values-aligned large-cap strategies amid ongoing sector rotation and sustainability considerations.

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) Overview

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) seeks to track the Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight Index. The index selects 50 companies from the Nasdaq-100 Index with the highest combined quality and growth scores and applies equal weighting. The fund holds approximately 50 securities and maintains a passive, rules-based structure with periodic rebalancing. Top holdings typically include companies such as Arm Holdings Plc and Micron Technology Inc. Sector allocations feature technology as the largest exposure (around 56%), followed by healthcare (approximately 15%) and consumer cyclical (about 12%). The expense ratio stands at 0.55%. Distinguishing features include the equal-weight approach, which mitigates concentration in the largest constituents, and the quality-growth selection filter that differentiates it from standard equal-weighted Nasdaq-100 products.

US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) Overview

US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) seeks to track the Beyond Investing US Vegan Climate Index. The index begins with approximately 500 large-cap U.S. companies and applies screens to exclude firms involved in animal agriculture, animal testing, fossil fuel production or consumption, and other activities inconsistent with vegan or climate objectives. The fund holds roughly 250 securities on a market-cap-weighted basis. Top holdings often feature technology names such as Micron Technology Inc., Broadcom Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Technology dominates sector exposure (around 63%), followed by financial services (approximately 13%) and communication services (about 9%). The expense ratio is 0.60%. Key features include the principles-based exclusion methodology and the resulting focus on companies perceived as more aligned with environmental and ethical criteria.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the large-cap growth segment, where technology remains the dominant sector amid ongoing innovation in semiconductors, software, and artificial intelligence. Broader market cycles influenced by interest rate expectations, earnings growth in high-quality companies, and capital allocation toward growth equities continue to shape performance dynamics. VEGN’s thematic screens respond to rising investor interest in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, particularly climate considerations, while regulatory developments around sustainability disclosures may indirectly affect eligible universes. QQEW’s equal-weight construction provides a buffer against mega-cap concentration risks prevalent in traditional market-cap indices. Macro drivers such as supply chain resilience and productivity gains from technology adoption support both strategies, though VEGN faces additional constraints from its exclusion criteria that can alter sector and company representation over time.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, QQEW’s equal-weight methodology has delivered differentiated returns compared with market-cap-weighted peers by providing more balanced participation across its 50 holdings during sector rotations. VEGN’s performance has reflected both broad technology strength and the impact of its exclusion screens, which remove certain energy and traditional industrial names while retaining significant technology exposure. Relative positioning shows QQEW potentially benefiting from reduced single-stock concentration, whereas VEGN may exhibit distinct volatility patterns tied to its thematic filters during periods of shifting sustainability preferences or macroeconomic shifts. Both funds have participated in technology-driven rallies, yet their structural differences influence sensitivity to interest rate changes and earnings cycles of top holdings.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification through equal weighting, and consistent quality-growth selection within a defined large-cap universe, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) for investors prioritizing structural efficiency and risk mitigation in growth-oriented portfolios.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QQEW vs. VEGN commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQEW is a Hold and VEGN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQEW has more net assets: 1.78B vs. VEGN (190M). VEGN has a higher annual dividend yield than QQEW: VEGN (29.794) vs QQEW (10.044). QQEW was incepted earlier than VEGN: QQEW (20 years) vs VEGN (7 years). QQEW (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than VEGN (0.60). QQEW has a higher turnover VEGN (15.00) vs VEGN (15.00).
QQEWVEGNQQEW / VEGN
Gain YTD10.04429.79434%
Net Assets1.78B190M935%
Total Expense Ratio0.550.6092%
Turnover58.0015.00387%
Yield0.290.4563%
Fund Existence20 years7 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQEWVEGN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QQEW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VEGN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVIIX10.28N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity A
UMPSX67.63N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraMid Cap Svc
CLSPX34.27N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I
FMFTX99.95N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials M
HSWRX23.21N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders International Stk R3

QQEW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQEW has been closely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQEW jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQEW
1D Price
Change %
QQEW100%
-0.28%
SWKS - QQEW
72%
Closely correlated
+5.15%
CDNS - QQEW
69%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
ABNB - QQEW
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
ZM - QQEW
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
CRWD - QQEW
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
More