Investors evaluating large-cap growth exposure often compare funds with overlapping technology tilts but divergent construction methodologies. First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) both target U.S. equities with significant technology allocations yet pursue distinct objectives. QQEW applies equal weighting and quality-growth selection within the Nasdaq-100 universe, while VEGN implements market-cap weighting with comprehensive vegan and climate-related exclusions. These differences make the pair relevant for investors seeking either factor-enhanced Nasdaq exposure or values-aligned large-cap strategies amid ongoing sector rotation and sustainability considerations.
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) seeks to track the Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight Index. The index selects 50 companies from the Nasdaq-100 Index with the highest combined quality and growth scores and applies equal weighting. The fund holds approximately 50 securities and maintains a passive, rules-based structure with periodic rebalancing. Top holdings typically include companies such as Arm Holdings Plc and Micron Technology Inc. Sector allocations feature technology as the largest exposure (around 56%), followed by healthcare (approximately 15%) and consumer cyclical (about 12%). The expense ratio stands at 0.55%. Distinguishing features include the equal-weight approach, which mitigates concentration in the largest constituents, and the quality-growth selection filter that differentiates it from standard equal-weighted Nasdaq-100 products.
US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) seeks to track the Beyond Investing US Vegan Climate Index. The index begins with approximately 500 large-cap U.S. companies and applies screens to exclude firms involved in animal agriculture, animal testing, fossil fuel production or consumption, and other activities inconsistent with vegan or climate objectives. The fund holds roughly 250 securities on a market-cap-weighted basis. Top holdings often feature technology names such as Micron Technology Inc., Broadcom Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Technology dominates sector exposure (around 63%), followed by financial services (approximately 13%) and communication services (about 9%). The expense ratio is 0.60%. Key features include the principles-based exclusion methodology and the resulting focus on companies perceived as more aligned with environmental and ethical criteria.
Both ETFs operate within the large-cap growth segment, where technology remains the dominant sector amid ongoing innovation in semiconductors, software, and artificial intelligence. Broader market cycles influenced by interest rate expectations, earnings growth in high-quality companies, and capital allocation toward growth equities continue to shape performance dynamics. VEGN’s thematic screens respond to rising investor interest in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, particularly climate considerations, while regulatory developments around sustainability disclosures may indirectly affect eligible universes. QQEW’s equal-weight construction provides a buffer against mega-cap concentration risks prevalent in traditional market-cap indices. Macro drivers such as supply chain resilience and productivity gains from technology adoption support both strategies, though VEGN faces additional constraints from its exclusion criteria that can alter sector and company representation over time.
In recent market cycles, QQEW’s equal-weight methodology has delivered differentiated returns compared with market-cap-weighted peers by providing more balanced participation across its 50 holdings during sector rotations. VEGN’s performance has reflected both broad technology strength and the impact of its exclusion screens, which remove certain energy and traditional industrial names while retaining significant technology exposure. Relative positioning shows QQEW potentially benefiting from reduced single-stock concentration, whereas VEGN may exhibit distinct volatility patterns tied to its thematic filters during periods of shifting sustainability preferences or macroeconomic shifts. Both funds have participated in technology-driven rallies, yet their structural differences influence sensitivity to interest rate changes and earnings cycles of top holdings.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.
Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification through equal weighting, and consistent quality-growth selection within a defined large-cap universe, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) for investors prioritizing structural efficiency and risk mitigation in growth-oriented portfolios.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| QQEW | VEGN | QQEW / VEGN | |
| Gain YTD | 10.044 | 29.794 | 34% |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 190M | 935% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.60 | 92% |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 15.00 | 387% |
| Yield | 0.29 | 0.45 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| QQEW | VEGN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQEW has been closely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQEW jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQEW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQEW | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| SWKS - QQEW | 72% Closely correlated | +5.15% | ||
| CDNS - QQEW | 69% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| ABNB - QQEW | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| ZM - QQEW | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| CRWD - QQEW | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||