QQH
Price
$84.42
Change
-$0.14 (-0.17%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
755.9M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QQQM
Price
$296.07
Change
+$0.56 (+0.19%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
105.08B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQH vs QQQM

QQH vs QQQM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) vs. Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM)

Key Takeaways

  • QQH is an actively managed ETF that dynamically shifts exposure between Nasdaq-100 stocks and U.S. Treasurys based on proprietary risk signals, while QQQM provides straightforward passive exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index.
  • QQQM offers significantly lower costs with an expense ratio of 0.15% compared to QQH at 0.98%, making it more efficient for long-term buy-and-hold investors.
  • Both ETFs deliver concentrated exposure to large-cap technology and growth sectors, though QQH incorporates defensive mechanisms that can reduce equity risk during market stress.
  • QQQM maintains approximately 104 holdings with heavy weighting toward mega-cap names, while QQH typically holds 80–120 stocks and may allocate to fixed income depending on market conditions.
  • The structural difference positions QQH as a tactical, risk-managed vehicle and QQQM as a core, low-cost benchmark tracker within the same thematic universe.
  • Investors seeking cost efficiency and consistent index tracking may prefer QQQM, whereas those valuing adaptive risk controls may consider QQH.

Introduction

Investors focused on large-cap U.S. technology and growth equities often evaluate QQH and QQQM because both provide access to the same high-profile names that dominate the Nasdaq-100. Rather than competing directly, the ETFs represent distinct approaches: one employs active, rules-based risk management, while the other delivers low-cost passive replication of the benchmark. This comparison helps investors understand how structural features influence exposure, costs, and positioning within the ongoing technology-driven market environment.

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) Overview

The HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is an actively managed fund launched in 2019 that seeks long-term capital appreciation through a proprietary index strategy. The fund uses the HCM-BuyLine® indicator to dynamically adjust allocations between Nasdaq-100 equities and U.S. Treasurys or cash equivalents when market risk signals turn negative. It typically holds 80–120 stocks with a focus on technology and growth sectors, though holdings can shift based on the model. Sector allocations generally emphasize technology (around 60%), consumer cyclical, and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.98%. This rules-based, adaptive structure distinguishes QQH as a defensive thematic vehicle rather than a static index tracker.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Overview

The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is a passive fund that seeks to track the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index before fees and expenses. Launched in 2020 as a lower-cost alternative to the original QQQ, it holds approximately 104 large- and mega-cap U.S. companies, with the heaviest concentrations in technology and consumer discretionary sectors. Top holdings typically include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and MU. The expense ratio is 0.15%. The fund is rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually, delivering transparent, rules-based exposure without active overlays. This structure makes QQQM a core holding for investors seeking efficient Nasdaq-100 benchmark performance.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the large-cap technology and growth equity universe, which continues to benefit from secular trends in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital transformation. Capital flows into innovation-driven sectors remain robust amid strong corporate earnings from leading semiconductor and software companies. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and global supply-chain dynamics influence sector momentum, while regulatory scrutiny around technology platforms and antitrust issues represents an ongoing consideration. The environment favors companies with scalable business models and pricing power, though valuation levels and potential rotation into value or defensive assets remain relevant for relative performance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, QQQM has delivered returns closely aligned with the Nasdaq-100 Index, benefiting from consistent exposure to high-growth mega-cap names during technology rallies. QQH has exhibited lower volatility in periods of market stress due to its ability to reduce equity exposure in favor of Treasurys when risk signals activate. Relative positioning highlights QQQM’s higher beta to the benchmark and greater sensitivity to earnings cycles in top holdings, while QQH offers tactical flexibility that can mitigate drawdowns during sector rotations or macroeconomic shifts. Over broader timeframes, cost differentials compound in favor of the lower-expense passive vehicle.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing QQH and QQQM can leverage the platform to refine their analysis further.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to QQQM. The combination of substantially lower expense ratio, transparent passive tracking of a high-momentum index, and broad diversification within the Nasdaq-100 universe provides superior cost efficiency and consistency for most investors. QQH offers valuable defensive characteristics for those prioritizing risk management, yet the higher fee and active overlay introduce additional complexity without guaranteed outperformance in all regimes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QQH vs. QQQM commentary
Sep 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQH is a Buy and QQQM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQM has more net assets: 105B vs. QQH (756M). QQQM has a higher annual dividend yield than QQH: QQQM (17.357) vs QQH (9.119). QQH was incepted earlier than QQQM: QQH (7 years) vs QQQM (6 years). QQQM (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QQH (0.98). QQH has a higher turnover QQQM (6.00) vs QQQM (6.00).
QQHQQQMQQH / QQQM
Gain YTD9.11917.35753%
Net Assets756M105B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.980.15653%
Turnover165.006.002,750%
Yield0.190.4444%
Fund Existence7 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQHQQQM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QQH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QQQM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSPTX55.470.38
+0.69%
Fidelity Select Technology
PSVKX23.730.07
+0.30%
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R4
JDSAX27.56N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value A
CDVZX21.66-0.05
-0.23%
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
APHDX21.14-0.07
-0.33%
Artisan Global Discovery Institutional

QQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQH has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QQH jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQH
1D Price
Change %
QQH100%
-0.17%
SWKS - QQH
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
ZS - QQH
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.50%
ZM - QQH
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
DOCU - QQH
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.70%
OKTA - QQH
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More