QS
Price
$7.02
Change
+$0.22 (+3.24%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.04B
19 days until earnings call
SES
Price
$0.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
596.34M
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QS vs SES

Header iconQS vs SES Comparison
Open Charts QS vs SESBanner chart's image
QuantumScape
Price$7.02
Change+$0.22 (+3.24%)
Volume$19.9M
Capitalization3.04B
SES AI
Price$0.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$147.76K
Capitalization596.34M
QS vs SES Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QS vs. SES commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QS is a Buy and SES is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (QS: $7.02 vs. SES: $0.88)
Brand notoriety: QS and SES are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QS: 85% vs. SES: 38%
Market capitalization -- QS: $3.04B vs. SES: $596.34M
QS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.04B. SES’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $596.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSES’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both QS and SES are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SES’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than SES.

Price Growth

QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -8.24% price change this week, while SES (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -6.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

SES is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.35% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.04B) has a higher market cap than SES($596M). QS YTD gains are higher at: 35.260 vs. SES (-59.721). SES has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -72.62M vs. QS (-392.95M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. SES (332M). SES has less debt than QS: SES (13.7M) vs QS (101M). QS (0) and SES (0) have equivalent revenues.
QSSESQS / SES
Capitalization3.04B596M510%
EBITDA-392.95M-72.62M541%
Gain YTD35.260-59.721-59%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.07B332M323%
Total Debt101M13.7M737%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SES: Fundamental Ratings
SES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSSES
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLDIX32.39N/A
N/A
Gabelli Gold I
GOIGX32.37N/A
N/A
JHancock International Growth A
ACVRX10.48N/A
N/A
American Century International Val R
JIVCX30.26N/A
N/A
JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val C
RBCRX9.93N/A
N/A
RBC China Equity R6

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
+3.24%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.51%
GGR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
LIDR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
+10.36%
HYLN - QS
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
LIMAF - QS
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More