QTUM
Price
$163.20
Change
-$5.40 (-3.20%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.34B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXX
Price
$603.51
Change
-$51.50 (-7.86%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
46.98B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTUM vs SOXX

QTUM vs SOXX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) vs. iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)

Key Takeaways

  • Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) offers thematic exposure to quantum computing and machine learning companies, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) provides concentrated access to the semiconductor sector.
  • QTUM holds approximately 85 securities with a broader global tilt, whereas SOXX maintains a focused portfolio of about 30 U.S.-listed semiconductor firms.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.40% for QTUM and 0.34% for SOXX, reflecting modest cost differences between the thematic and sector strategies.
  • QTUM allocates roughly 85% to technology with notable industrials exposure, compared to SOXX’s 100% technology weighting split between semiconductors and equipment.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and target innovation-driven segments, yet QTUM emphasizes emerging quantum and AI-enabling technologies while SOXX tracks established semiconductor leaders.
  • Structural differences in diversification and concentration influence risk profiles, with SOXX exhibiting higher concentration in top holdings.

Introduction

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) attract investors seeking growth tied to advanced technologies. These exchange-traded funds do not compete directly but deliver complementary exposure within the technology ecosystem. QTUM targets quantum computing and machine learning themes, while SOXX focuses on the semiconductor value chain that underpins artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure. Comparing them helps investors evaluate thematic breadth versus sector depth when positioning for long-term innovation cycles.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) passively tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. The fund holds approximately 85 securities, emphasizing companies involved in quantum technologies and machine learning applications. Top holdings typically include Micron Technology (MU), Marvell Technology (MRVL), STMicroelectronics (STM), Intel (INTC), and MediaTek, with the top 10 representing around 22-23% of assets. Sector allocation centers on technology at approximately 85%, followed by industrials at 8-9% and communication services near 5%. The expense ratio is 0.40%. As a rules-based thematic ETF, it rebalances periodically according to index methodology to maintain exposure to liquid global firms in these emerging fields.

iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) Overview

iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) passively tracks the ICE Semiconductor Sector Index, a modified market-capitalization-weighted benchmark of U.S.-listed semiconductor companies. The fund maintains about 30 holdings, delivering concentrated exposure across the semiconductor supply chain. Leading positions often feature Micron Technology (MU), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Broadcom (AVGO), Intel (INTC), and Marvell Technology (MRVL), with the top 10 comprising roughly 62% of assets. The portfolio is 100% allocated to technology, split primarily between semiconductors (approximately 80%) and semiconductor equipment (approximately 20%). The expense ratio is 0.34%. SOXX employs standard index rebalancing to reflect changes in the underlying semiconductor sector constituents.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor industry and adjacent quantum and machine learning sectors operate within a dynamic environment shaped by artificial intelligence demand, data center expansion, and geopolitical supply-chain considerations. Capital expenditures by technology leaders continue to support equipment and chipmakers, while regulatory scrutiny around export controls and domestic manufacturing incentives influences flows. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories and corporate spending cycles affect both areas. Quantum computing remains an earlier-stage theme with longer commercialization horizons, whereas semiconductors represent a more mature yet rapidly evolving segment benefiting from established production scales.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have reflected broader technology sector momentum driven by artificial intelligence adoption and earnings strength among key holdings. SOXX’s higher concentration has contributed to greater sensitivity to semiconductor-specific earnings reports and inventory cycles. QTUM’s wider holdings across quantum and machine learning names provide additional diversification within innovation themes, potentially moderating volatility relative to pure semiconductor exposure during sector rotations. Relative positioning depends on investor views regarding the pace of quantum commercialization versus near-term semiconductor demand from artificial intelligence infrastructure buildouts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) at present due to its lower expense ratio, established sector leadership, and alignment with current semiconductor demand drivers. QTUM offers differentiated thematic exposure that could appeal in longer-horizon scenarios emphasizing quantum advancements. Investors should assess these factors against their specific objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QTUM vs. SOXX commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Buy and SOXX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXX has more net assets: 47B vs. QTUM (6.34B). SOXX has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SOXX (100.581) vs QTUM (54.059). QTUM was incepted earlier than SOXX: QTUM (8 years) vs SOXX (25 years). SOXX (0.34) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SOXX (27.00) vs SOXX (27.00).
QTUMSOXXQTUM / SOXX
Gain YTD54.059100.58154%
Net Assets6.34B47B13%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.34118%
Turnover42.0027.00156%
Yield0.730.29250%
Fund Existence8 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTUMSOXX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DUSL99.642.04
+2.09%
Direxion Dly Industrials Bull 3X ShsETF
EVT26.650.12
+0.45%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
CLOB50.42-0.01
-0.01%
VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF
IDLV34.22-0.02
-0.05%
Invesco S&P Intl Dev Low Vol ETF
JXX32.58-0.30
-0.92%
Janus Henderson Transformational Gr ETF

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
+0.38%
LRCX - QTUM
79%
Closely correlated
+5.27%
AMAT - QTUM
74%
Closely correlated
+3.74%
TSM - QTUM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
MKSI - QTUM
74%
Closely correlated
+3.49%
KLAC - QTUM
73%
Closely correlated
+3.70%
More