QTUM
Price
$148.78
Change
+$1.83 (+1.25%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.63B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXX
Price
$514.20
Change
+$8.02 (+1.58%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
41.76B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTUM vs SOXX

QTUM vs SOXX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) vs. iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)

Key Takeaways

  • Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) offers thematic exposure to quantum computing and machine learning companies through a modified equal-weighted index, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) provides concentrated passive exposure to the semiconductor sector via a market-cap-weighted approach.
  • QTUM maintains broader diversification with approximately 70-80 holdings focused on emerging technologies, whereas SOXX concentrates on 30 leading semiconductor firms, resulting in higher sector-specific risk but potentially stronger alignment with established industry leaders.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.40% for QTUM and approximately 0.34% for SOXX, reflecting the cost of specialized thematic indexing versus a more standardized sector benchmark.
  • Both ETFs target technology-driven growth, but QTUM emphasizes next-generation quantum and artificial intelligence applications, while SOXX captures the full semiconductor value chain including fabrication, equipment, and design.
  • Structural differences in weighting and rebalancing lead to varying volatility profiles, with QTUM’s equal-weighting potentially mitigating concentration risk compared to SOXX’s top-heavy allocations.
  • In the current environment of artificial intelligence expansion and digital infrastructure investment, these funds represent complementary yet distinct strategies within the broader technology ecosystem.

Introduction

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) attract investor attention amid accelerating artificial intelligence adoption and semiconductor demand. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they deliver differentiated exposure within the technology sector. QTUM pursues a thematic strategy centered on quantum computing and machine learning, while SOXX tracks established semiconductor companies essential to computing hardware and advanced chips. Investors comparing the two evaluate trade-offs between emerging technology themes and proven sector leadership, along with differences in diversification, costs, and risk characteristics suited to varying portfolio objectives.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

QTUM seeks to track the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index through a passive indexing approach. The fund holds a modified equal-weighted portfolio of companies deriving at least 50% of revenue or activity from quantum computing and machine learning technologies. It typically contains 70-80 holdings, providing diversified access to both pure-play innovators and established technology firms. Top positions often include names such as Arqit Quantum, Horizon Quantum Holdings, and larger players like Intel. Sector allocation concentrates heavily in technology, exceeding 80% in recent periods. The expense ratio is 0.40%. Rebalancing occurs semi-annually as part of the index methodology, supporting a rules-based thematic strategy without active management.

iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) Overview

SOXX tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index (or ICE Semiconductor Index) using a passive, sampling-based replication strategy. The fund concentrates on 30 U.S.-listed semiconductor companies across the value chain, including manufacturers, equipment providers, and designers. Holdings feature market-cap weighting with caps on individual securities to manage concentration. Recent top holdings include Micron Technology, Advanced Micro Devices, NVIDIA, Intel, and Broadcom. Sector exposure focuses almost entirely on semiconductors and related equipment. The expense ratio stands at approximately 0.34%. The index undergoes annual reconstitution and quarterly rebalancing, delivering targeted yet constrained exposure to the semiconductor industry.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor and quantum computing sectors operate within a dynamic environment shaped by artificial intelligence proliferation, data center expansion, and ongoing capital expenditures in digital infrastructure. Regulatory developments around technology export controls and supply chain resilience continue to influence capital allocation. Macroeconomic factors, including interest rate trajectories and global manufacturing cycles, affect demand for chips and advanced computing solutions. Both ETFs benefit from secular growth in artificial intelligence applications, though they face risks from cyclical downturns, geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains, and rapid technological shifts that could alter competitive landscapes.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, SOXX has demonstrated strong alignment with semiconductor earnings momentum and capital spending trends, exhibiting higher volatility tied to its concentrated holdings. QTUM’s equal-weighted structure and broader thematic focus have produced distinct return patterns, often reflecting investor sentiment toward early-stage quantum and machine learning developments. In periods of sector rotation favoring established hardware leaders, SOXX has shown relative resilience, while QTUM has captured upside from speculative growth themes. Differences in volatility stem from SOXX’s narrower focus versus QTUM’s diversified yet specialized holdings, influencing how each responds to interest rate shifts and earnings seasons.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like QTUM and SOXX may find the platform useful for refining screening criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) in the current environment. Its lower expense ratio, established liquidity, and direct alignment with proven semiconductor leaders provide a more consistent risk-adjusted positioning amid sustained artificial intelligence-driven demand, though QTUM retains appeal for investors prioritizing thematic exposure to quantum technologies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QTUM vs. SOXX commentary
Aug 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and SOXX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXX has more net assets: 41.8B vs. QTUM (5.63B). SOXX has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SOXX (68.266) vs QTUM (34.490). QTUM was incepted earlier than SOXX: QTUM (8 years) vs SOXX (25 years). SOXX (0.34) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SOXX (27.00) vs SOXX (27.00).
QTUMSOXXQTUM / SOXX
Gain YTD34.49068.26651%
Net Assets5.63B41.8B13%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.34118%
Turnover42.0027.00156%
Yield0.830.29286%
Fund Existence8 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTUMSOXX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCC38.140.49
+1.31%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Stapl ETF
DEW73.260.16
+0.22%
WisdomTree Global High Dividend ETF
TMDV53.62N/A
N/A
ProShares Russell US Dividend Grwr ETF
FDN286.50-0.20
-0.07%
First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF
QMAR37.54-0.09
-0.24%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Mar

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
-2.35%
LRCX - QTUM
81%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
MKSI - QTUM
79%
Closely correlated
-3.60%
LSCC - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
AMAT - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
KLAC - QTUM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
More

SOXX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXX has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXX jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXX
1D Price
Change %
SOXX100%
-2.67%
LRCX - SOXX
89%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
AMAT - SOXX
87%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
KLAC - SOXX
85%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
MPWR - SOXX
82%
Closely correlated
-2.37%
ENTG - SOXX
82%
Closely correlated
-3.77%
More