Advertisement
QUAD vs RHLD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUAD is a Buy and RHLD is a Buy.
QUAD | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QUAD | RHLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 12 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 83% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QUAD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while RHLD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- QUAD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RHLD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QUAD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RHLD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QUAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RHLD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
QUAD (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RHLD (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +6.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -4.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
QUAD is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-4.60% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
Advertisement
QUAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUAD has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUAD jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAD | 100% | +1.84% | ||
| GHC - QUAD | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| BRC - QUAD | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| LINC - QUAD | 35% Loosely correlated | -5.95% | ||
| EBF - QUAD | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| BCO - QUAD | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
More | ||||
RHLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RHLD and TIC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RHLD and TIC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RHLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHLD | 100% | -1.66% | ||
| TIC - RHLD | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| AZZ - RHLD | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| QUAD - RHLD | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
| ABM - RHLD | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
| LZ - RHLD | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||