QUAN
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
TLS
Price
$2.61
Change
-$0.26 (-9.06%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
292.53M
58 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

QUAN vs TLS

Header iconQUAN vs TLS Comparison
Open Charts QUAN vs TLSBanner chart's image
Quantum International
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$80.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Telos
Price$2.61
Change-$0.26 (-9.06%)
Volume$5.93K
Capitalization292.53M
QUAN vs TLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
TLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QUAN vs. TLS commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUAN is a Hold and TLS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (QUAN: $0.07 vs. TLS: $2.87)
Brand notoriety: QUAN and TLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QUAN: 38% vs. TLS: 107%
Market capitalization -- QUAN: $0 vs. TLS: $292.53M
QUAN [@Packaged Software] is valued at $0. TLS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $292.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QUAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QUAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUAN is a better buy in the long-term than TLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TLS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TLS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

QUAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -21.64% price change this week, while TLS (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

TLS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-3.24% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLS YTD gains are higher at: -16.082 vs. QUAN (-66.500).
QUANTLSQUAN / TLS
CapitalizationN/A293M-
EBITDAN/A-24.17M-
Gain YTD-66.500-16.082414%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A145M-
Total CashN/A99.3M-
Total DebtN/A11.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QUAN: Fundamental Ratings
QUAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIDAX7.640.11
+1.46%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem A
NSBRX61.550.55
+0.90%
Nuveen Dividend Growth I
FAPNX13.020.05
+0.39%
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Z
EGOAX17.260.05
+0.29%
Allspring Large Cap Core A
IYBFX23.450.02
+0.09%
Macquarie Balanced Fund Class R

QUAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUAN and KWIK have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUAN and KWIK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUAN
1D Price
Change %
QUAN100%
+0.60%
KWIK - QUAN
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLS - QUAN
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
YHEKF - QUAN
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPNFF - QUAN
9%
Poorly correlated
-16.84%
PUBM - QUAN
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More

TLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLS has been loosely correlated with FIVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLS jumps, then FIVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLS
1D Price
Change %
TLS100%
-0.69%
FIVN - TLS
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
MITK - TLS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
PUBM - TLS
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
NRDY - TLS
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IMXI - TLS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
More