Ad is loading...
QUAN
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
TLS
Price
$3.30
Change
-$0.20 (-5.71%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
115 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

QUAN vs TLS

Header iconQUAN vs TLS Comparison
Open Charts QUAN vs TLSBanner chart's image
Quantum International
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.53K
CapitalizationN/A
Telos
Price$3.30
Change-$0.20 (-5.71%)
Volume$492.51K
CapitalizationN/A
QUAN vs TLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
TLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QUAN vs. TLS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUAN is a Hold and TLS is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (QUAN: $0.03 vs. TLS: $3.30)
Brand notoriety: QUAN and TLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QUAN: 17% vs. TLS: 102%
Market capitalization -- QUAN: $0 vs. TLS: $292.53M
QUAN [@Packaged Software] is valued at $0. TLS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $292.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QUAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QUAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both QUAN and TLS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

QUAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -13.53% price change this week, while TLS (@Packaged Software) price change was -29.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

TLS is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLS YTD gains are higher at: -9.589 vs. QUAN (-21.394).
QUANTLSQUAN / TLS
CapitalizationN/A293M-
EBITDAN/A-24.17M-
Gain YTD-21.394-9.589223%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A145M-
Total CashN/A99.3M-
Total DebtN/A11.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QUAN: Fundamental Ratings
QUAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IUENX25.42-0.20
-0.78%
JPMorgan International Focus R6
WAMFX24.19-0.25
-1.02%
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
SBRVX16.18-0.19
-1.16%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ret
OIGNX34.55-0.42
-1.20%
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr R
BSDAX13.39-0.32
-2.33%
BlackRock SMID-Cap Growth Equity Inv A

QUAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUAN and KWIK have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUAN and KWIK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUAN
1D Price
Change %
QUAN100%
-13.53%
KWIK - QUAN
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
TLS - QUAN
12%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
YHEKF - QUAN
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPNFF - QUAN
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
PUBM - QUAN
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
More