Advertisement
RAC vs UCFI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RAC is a Hold and UCFI is a Buy.
| UCFI | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while UCFI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UCFI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
RAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.19% price change this week, while UCFI (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.54%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.87%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.93% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Food: Major Diversified (-3.94% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LFAO | 154.56 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF (LFAO) | |||
| FDIF | 41.71 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) | |||
| AAUA | 58.77 | -0.11 | -0.19% |
| Alpha Architect US Equity 3 ETF (AAUA) | |||
| IBHL | 24.33 | -0.14 | -0.56% |
| iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) | |||
| HYS | 89.92 | -0.56 | -0.62% |
| PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index Exchange-Traded Fund (HYS) | |||
RAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RAC and WENNU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RAC and WENNU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAC | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| WENNU - RAC | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LWACU - RAC | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASPC - RAC | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| DAAQ - RAC | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| HCMAU - RAC | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
UCFI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UCFI and APACU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCFI and APACU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCFI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCFI | 100% | N/A | ||
| APACU - UCFI | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| NPACU - UCFI | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| RAC - UCFI | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| LCCCU - UCFI | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RDAGU - UCFI | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||