Advertisement
RDNT vs XGN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDNT is a Hold and XGN is a Hold.
| RDNT | XGN | RDNT / XGN | |
| Capitalization | 5.94B | 171M | 3,475% |
| EBITDA | 337M | -11.32M | -2,978% |
| Gain YTD | 5.802 | 15.625 | 37% |
| P/E Ratio | 1425.75 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.27B | 71.1M | 3,191% |
| Total Cash | 726M | 24.6M | 2,951% |
| Total Debt | 2.18B | 26M | 8,396% |
RDNT | XGN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
XGN's Valuation (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RDNT (97) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that XGN’s stock grew significantly faster than RDNT’s over the last 12 months.
RDNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XGN (100) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than XGN’s over the last 12 months.
RDNT's SMR Rating (91) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as XGN (99) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew similarly to XGN’s over the last 12 months.
XGN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RDNT (43) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that XGN’s stock grew similarly to RDNT’s over the last 12 months.
RDNT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for XGN (100) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew significantly faster than XGN’s over the last 12 months.
| RDNT | XGN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 12 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RDNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while XGN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RDNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XGN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RDNT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XGN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RDNT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- XGN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RDNT (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +2.41% price change this week, while XGN (@Medical Specialties) price change was -7.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
RDNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
XGN is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (-3.54% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SVXY | 62.88 | 1.40 | +2.28% |
| ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures | |||
| VSTL | 23.33 | 0.38 | +1.66% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF | |||
| IVW | 139.31 | 1.13 | +0.82% |
| iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | |||
| GIGB | 44.28 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Goldman Sachs Acss Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
| ECNS | 27.81 | -0.25 | -0.89% |
| iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | |||
XGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XGN and SHC have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XGN and SHC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XGN | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| SHC - XGN | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| QDEL - XGN | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| MXCT - XGN | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.52% | ||
| GRAL - XGN | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| RDNT - XGN | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||