Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SGLC
RECS vs SGLC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SGLC
RECS vs SGLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SGLC commentary
Jul 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and SGLC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.93B vs. SGLC (78.6M). SGLC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SGLC (15.087) vs RECS (8.815). RECS was incepted earlier than SGLC: RECS (7 years) vs SGLC (3 years). SGLC has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| RECS | SGLC | RECS / SGLC | |
| Gain YTD | 8.815 | 15.087 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 5.93B | 78.6M | 7,539% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 95.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.22 | 340% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SGLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||
SGLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGLC has been loosely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGLC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGLC | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| EVR - SGLC | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| MS - SGLC | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| C - SGLC | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| CCL - SGLC | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| MPWR - SGLC | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||