Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SPHQ
RECS vs SPHQ Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SPHQ
RECS vs SPHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SPHQ commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and SPHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPHQ has more net assets: 18.8B vs. RECS (5.76B). SPHQ has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SPHQ (15.159) vs RECS (7.419). RECS was incepted earlier than SPHQ: RECS (7 years) vs SPHQ (21 years). RECS (0.15) and SPHQ (0.15) have comparable expense ratios . SPHQ has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| RECS | SPHQ | RECS / SPHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 7.419 | 15.159 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 5.76B | 18.8B | 31% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 100% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 57.00 | 56% |
| Yield | 0.74 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SPHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.17% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.81% | ||
More | ||||
SPHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPHQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPHQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPHQ | 100% | +1.26% | ||
| LRCX - SPHQ | 68% Closely correlated | +5.45% | ||
| EMR - SPHQ | 67% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ROK - SPHQ | 67% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CDNS - SPHQ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| KLAC - SPHQ | 64% Loosely correlated | +5.42% | ||
More | ||||