Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWAX
REMCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWAX
REMCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Hold and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. REMCX (1.29B). REMCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: REMCX (1.05) vs RNWAX (0.50). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: REMCX (28 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: REMCX (0) vs RNWAX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.20 vs. RNWAX (19.29). REMCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.95 vs. RNWAX (14.04).
| REMCX | RNWAX | REMCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.66 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 1.66 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.548 | 15.987 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 88.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.50 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.20 | 19.29 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.81 | 47.26 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.95 | 14.04 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.51 | 99.54 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement