Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWAX
REMCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWAX
REMCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. REMCX (1.34B). REMCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: REMCX (0.98) vs RNWAX (0.49). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: REMCX (27 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: REMCX (0) vs RNWAX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.75 vs. RNWAX (28.10). REMCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.22 vs. RNWAX (14.29).
| REMCX | RNWAX | REMCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.66 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 1.66 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.197 | 16.269 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 85.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.49 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.75 | 28.10 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.20 | 51.54 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.22 | 14.29 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.71 | 111.13 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement