Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWBX
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWBX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
Price$17.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets762.93M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. REMCX (763M). REMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMCX (1.48) vs RNWBX (0.13). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMCX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). REMCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMCX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.66 vs. RNWBX (12.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. REMCX (8.11).
| REMCX | RNWBX | REMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 1.67 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.678 | 17.729 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 763M | 71.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 0.13 | 1,149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.66 | 12.87 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.52 | 30.09 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.11 | 22.93 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.03 | 72.17 | 40% |