Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWBX
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWBX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
Price$18.62
Change+$0.28 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets805.94M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.62
Change+$1.04 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.06B
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. REMCX (806M). REMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMCX (1.35) vs RNWBX (0.12). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMCX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). REMCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMCX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.02 vs. RNWBX (13.92). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.09 vs. REMCX (12.22).
| REMCX | RNWBX | REMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 1.67 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.833 | 23.209 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.12 | 1,123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.02 | 13.92 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | 58.36 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.22 | 24.09 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.14 | 85.04 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement