Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWBX
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWBX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
Price$16.18
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets772.85M
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.94
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. REMCX (773M). REMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMCX (1.59) vs RNWBX (0.13). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMCX (26 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). REMCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMCX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. RNWBX (6.57). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.37 vs. REMCX (8.88).
| REMCX | RNWBX | REMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 1.67 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.895 | 11.407 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 773M | 67.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.13 | 1,185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 6.57 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.99 | 21.12 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.88 | 25.37 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.66 | 55.86 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers