Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWBX
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWBX
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. REMCX (1.24B). REMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMCX (0.98) vs RNWBX (0.41). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMCX (27 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMCX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.89 vs. RNWBX (20.57). REMCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.71 vs. RNWBX (9.72).
| REMCX | RNWBX | REMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.66 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 1.66 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.390 | 13.885 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.41 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.89 | 20.57 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.55 | 46.04 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | 9.72 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.58 | 113.04 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers