Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWFX
REMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWFX
REMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. REMCX (1.24B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than REMCX: RNWFX (1.20) vs REMCX (0.98). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: REMCX (27 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: REMCX (0) vs RNWFX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.89 vs. RNWFX (22.14). RNWFX (15.23) and REMCX (14.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| REMCX | RNWFX | REMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.62 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.62 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.390 | 14.464 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.20 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.89 | 22.14 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.55 | 51.35 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | 15.23 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.58 | 126.01 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers