Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWFX
REMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWFX
REMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. REMCX (1.29B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than REMCX: RNWFX (1.22) vs REMCX (1.05). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: REMCX (28 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: REMCX (0) vs RNWFX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.20 vs. RNWFX (20.81). REMCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.95 vs. RNWFX (19.75).
| REMCX | RNWFX | REMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.62 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.62 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.548 | 16.763 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 88.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.22 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.20 | 20.81 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.81 | 52.57 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.95 | 19.75 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.51 | 111.75 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement