Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWHX
REMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWHX
REMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. REMCX (1.29B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than REMCX: RNWHX (1.17) vs REMCX (1.05). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: REMCX (28 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: REMCX (0) vs RNWHX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.20 vs. RNWHX (20.60). REMCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.95 vs. RNWHX (18.98).
| REMCX | RNWHX | REMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.72 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.548 | 16.697 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 88.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.17 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.20 | 20.60 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.81 | 51.90 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.95 | 18.98 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.51 | 109.02 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers