Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWHX
REMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWHX
REMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. REMCX (1.34B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than REMCX: RNWHX (1.15) vs REMCX (0.98). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: REMCX (27 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: REMCX (0) vs RNWHX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.75 vs. RNWHX (29.50). REMCX (20.22) and RNWHX (19.26) have equivalent 5 years return.
| REMCX | RNWHX | REMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.72 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.197 | 16.719 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 85.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.15 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.75 | 29.50 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.20 | 56.33 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.22 | 19.26 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.71 | 121.12 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement