Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REQAX vs RWMFX
REQAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts REQAX vs RWMFX
REQAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REQAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REQAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. REQAX (266M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than REQAX: RWMFX (1.44) vs REQAX (0.53). REQAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: REQAX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). REQAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). REQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). REQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: REQAX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.53 vs. REQAX (-1.11). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.40 vs. REQAX (-20.03).
| REQAX | RWMFX | REQAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.31 | 419% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.31 | 435% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.617 | 3.719 | 178% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.44 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.11 | 4.53 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.24 | 26.86 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.03 | 27.40 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.56 | 77.11 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement