Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REQAX vs RWMFX
REQAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts REQAX vs RWMFX
REQAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REQAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REQAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. REQAX (276M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than REQAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs REQAX (0.53). REQAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: REQAX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). REQAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). REQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). REQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: REQAX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. REQAX (5.16). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. REQAX (-16.73).
| REQAX | RWMFX | REQAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.31 | 419% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.31 | 435% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.281 | 5.575 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276M | 214B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.40 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.16 | 8.10 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.56 | 33.11 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.73 | 26.71 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.39 | 85.42 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement