Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SGRHX
RGACX vs SGRHX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SGRHX
RGACX vs SGRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SGRHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SGRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. SGRHX (2.79B). RGACX (0.00) and SGRHX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SGRHX: RGACX (24 years) vs SGRHX (11 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SGRHX (0.76). SGRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). SGRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: SGRHX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. SGRHX (-20.47). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. SGRHX (-37.24).
| RGACX | SGRHX | RGACX / SGRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.70 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.76 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.819 | -0.613 | -1,439% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 2.79B | 12,643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | -20.47 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.68 | 3.21 | 1,268% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.82 | -37.24 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.31 | -9.84 | -1,030% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers