Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TSNCX
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TSNCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change+$0.63 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.87B
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth C
Price$17.05
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TSNCX commentary
Nov 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. TSNCX (2.23B). RGACX pays higher dividends than TSNCX: RGACX (0.07) vs TSNCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TSNCX: RGACX (24 years) vs TSNCX (15 years). TSNCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). TSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSNCX: RGACX (250) vs TSNCX (2500). TSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.17 vs. RGACX (4.71). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.38 vs. TSNCX (-13.27).
| RGACX | TSNCX | RGACX / TSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.77 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.02 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 9.435 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 2.23B | 14,607% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.71 | 7.17 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.95 | 99.18 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.38 | -13.27 | -229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.24 | -23.10 | -360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement