Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TSNCX
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TSNCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.19
Change+$0.60 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth C
Price$19.07
Change+$0.14 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.55B
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TSNCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TSNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. TSNCX (2.55B). RGACX pays higher dividends than TSNCX: RGACX (0.07) vs TSNCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TSNCX: RGACX (23 years) vs TSNCX (15 years). TSNCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). TSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSNCX: RGACX (250) vs TSNCX (2500). TSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.73 vs. RGACX (16.32). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.39 vs. TSNCX (6.28).
| RGACX | TSNCX | RGACX / TSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.77 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.02 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.502 | 21.502 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 2.55B | 13,239% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.32 | 34.73 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.40 | 105.60 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.39 | 6.28 | 691% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.34 | -9.71 | -1,024% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement