Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WFOPX
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WFOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.52
Change-$0.91 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
Allspring Opportunity C
Price$41.84
Change-$0.75 (-1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WFOPX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WFOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. WFOPX (1.84B). RGACX pays higher dividends than WFOPX: RGACX (0.08) vs WFOPX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WFOPX: RGACX (23 years) vs WFOPX (17 years). WFOPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WFOPX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFOPX: RGACX (250) vs WFOPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. WFOPX (-3.23). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.78 vs. WFOPX (13.42).
| RGACX | WFOPX | RGACX / WFOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.92 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.94 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.903 | -1.137 | -431% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 1.84B | 16,866% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | -3.23 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.90 | 13.63 | 381% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.78 | 13.42 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.68 | -8.49 | -821% |