Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WFOPX
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WFOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.42
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Allspring Opportunity C
Price$45.08
Change+$0.22 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WFOPX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WFOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WFOPX (1.92B). RGACX pays higher dividends than WFOPX: RGACX (0.07) vs WFOPX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WFOPX: RGACX (23 years) vs WFOPX (17 years). WFOPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WFOPX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFOPX: RGACX (250) vs WFOPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.14 vs. WFOPX (1.67). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.50 vs. WFOPX (14.04).
| RGACX | WFOPX | RGACX / WFOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.92 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.94 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.099 | 4.643 | 282% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 1.92B | 17,092% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.14 | 1.67 | 1,027% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.85 | 13.07 | 435% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.50 | 14.04 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.94 | 0.22 | 36,943% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement