Ad is loading...
RGACX vs WFOPX
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WFOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$60.17
Change-$0.86 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.76B
Allspring Opportunity C
Price$35.38
Change-$0.77 (-2.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WFOPX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WFOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 249B vs. WFOPX (1.59B). RGACX pays higher dividends than WFOPX: RGACX (0.09) vs WFOPX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WFOPX: RGACX (23 years) vs WFOPX (17 years). WFOPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WFOPX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFOPX: RGACX (250) vs WFOPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.53 vs. WFOPX (-19.40). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.35 vs. WFOPX (6.61).
| RGACX | WFOPX | RGACX / WFOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.92 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.94 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.419 | -16.086 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249B | 1.59B | 15,700% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.53 | -19.40 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.11 | -19.22 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.35 | 6.61 | 520% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.41 | -22.87 | -159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...