Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WFOPX
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WFOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$73.29
Change+$0.27 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.2B
Allspring Opportunity C
Price$40.84
Change-$0.86 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WFOPX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WFOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 302B vs. WFOPX (1.81B). RGACX pays higher dividends than WFOPX: RGACX (0.08) vs WFOPX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WFOPX: RGACX (23 years) vs WFOPX (17 years). WFOPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WFOPX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFOPX: RGACX (250) vs WFOPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. WFOPX (-7.64). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.64 vs. WFOPX (14.40).
| RGACX | WFOPX | RGACX / WFOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.92 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.94 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.431 | -3.203 | -45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302B | 1.81B | 16,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | -7.64 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.44 | 6.54 | 603% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.64 | 14.40 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.83 | -11.09 | -567% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement