Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WOFDX
RGACX vs WOFDX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WOFDX
RGACX vs WOFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WOFDX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WOFDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WOFDX (1.88B). RGACX (0.00) and WOFDX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WOFDX: RGACX (24 years) vs WOFDX (24 years). WOFDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOFDX (21.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOFDX: RGACX (250) vs WOFDX (1000000). WOFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.15 vs. RGACX (0.93). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. WOFDX (-2.86).
| RGACX | WOFDX | RGACX / WOFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.00 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.12 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.397 | 8.831 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.88B | 18,969% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.93 | 4.15 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.65 | 16.27 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.91 | -2.86 | -382% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | 46.81 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement