Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs SWLGX
RGAHX vs SWLGX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs SWLGX
RGAHX vs SWLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. SWLGX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and SWLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SWLGX (4.83B). SWLGX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: SWLGX (0.43) vs RGAHX (0.40). RGAHX was incepted earlier than SWLGX: RGAHX (11 years) vs SWLGX (9 years). RGAHX (0.44) is less costly to investors than SWLGX (0.04). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SWLGX (16.00). SWLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: SWLGX (0) vs RGAHX (250). SWLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.42 vs. RGAHX (0.41). SWLGX return over 5 years is better than : 96.99 vs. RGAHX (12.16).
| RGAHX | SWLGX | RGAHX / SWLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.04 | 1,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.04 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.758 | 2.453 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 4.83B | 7,396% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.43 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.41 | 11.42 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.85 | 91.67 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.16 | 96.99 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement