Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs WLGCX
RGAHX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs WLGCX
RGAHX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. WLGCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a StrongBuy and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WLGCX (6.29B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: RGAHX (0.41) vs WLGCX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGAHX (11 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (24.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGAHX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. WLGCX (-9.36). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.85 vs. WLGCX (-9.96).
| RGAHX | WLGCX | RGAHX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.64 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.72 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.692 | 0.560 | 1,016% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6.29B | 5,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | -9.36 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.31 | 16.88 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.85 | -9.96 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.57 | 46.82 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers