RGC
Price
$18.83
Change
-$0.86 (-4.37%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
9.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBFM
Price
$2.22
Change
-$0.15 (-6.33%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.74M
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGC vs SBFM

Header iconRGC vs SBFM Comparison
Open Charts RGC vs SBFMBanner chart's image
RGC vs SBFM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGC vs. SBFM commentary
Jun 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGC is a Hold and SBFM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 13, 2026
Stock price -- (RGC: $19.04 vs. SBFM: $2.23)
Brand notoriety: RGC and SBFM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGC: 85% vs. SBFM: 6%
Market capitalization -- RGC: $9.42B vs. SBFM: $4.74M
RGC [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $9.42B. SBFM’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $4.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBFM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBFM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBFM is a better buy in the long-term than RGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBFM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBFM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBFM is a better buy in the short-term than RGC.

Price Growth

RGC (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -4.75% price change this week, while SBFM (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -9.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBFM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+2.56% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGC($9.42B) has a higher market cap than SBFM($4.74M). RGC YTD gains are higher at: -9.333 vs. SBFM (-81.870). RGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.99M vs. SBFM (-5.71M). SBFM has more cash in the bank: 6.91M vs. RGC (2.96M). RGC has less debt than SBFM: RGC (85.7K) vs SBFM (745K). SBFM has higher revenues than RGC: SBFM (35.5M) vs RGC (0).
RGCSBFMRGC / SBFM
Capitalization9.42B4.74M198,796%
EBITDA-3.99M-5.71M70%
Gain YTD-9.333-81.87011%
P/E RatioN/A0.20-
Revenue035.5M-
Total Cash2.96M6.91M43%
Total Debt85.7K745K12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGC vs SBFM: Fundamental Ratings
RGC
SBFM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5995
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6298
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10081
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBFM's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGC (96) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew significantly faster than RGC’s over the last 12 months.

SBFM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RGC (100) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew similarly to RGC’s over the last 12 months.

SBFM's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as RGC (100) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew similarly to RGC’s over the last 12 months.

RGC's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBFM (98) in the null industry. This means that RGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBFM’s over the last 12 months.

SBFM's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as RGC (100) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew similarly to RGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGCSBFM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBFM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRST15.740.31
+2.01%
Primis Financial Corp
ZION67.250.81
+1.22%
Zions Bancorporation NA
BGSF5.130.04
+0.79%
BGSF
BLZRU10.21N/A
N/A
Trailblazer Acquisition Corp Unit
VCEL37.43-1.14
-2.96%
Vericel Corp

RGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGC and HIMS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGC and HIMS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGC
1D Price
Change %
RGC100%
-3.30%
HIMS - RGC
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.10%
QNTM - RGC
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.87%
SBFM - RGC
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.91%
ACB - RGC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
CPIX - RGC
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More

SBFM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBFM and OGI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBFM and OGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBFM
1D Price
Change %
SBFM100%
-5.91%
OGI - SBFM
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
ESPR - SBFM
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGC - SBFM
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
TLRY - SBFM
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
ELAN - SBFM
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More