Advertisement
AMRX vs SBFM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMRX is a Hold and SBFM is a Hold.
AMRX | SBFM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 98 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 9 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SBFM's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMRX (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew significantly faster than AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
AMRX's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBFM (100) in the null industry. This means that AMRX’s stock grew significantly faster than SBFM’s over the last 12 months.
SBFM's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as AMRX (99) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew similarly to AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
AMRX's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBFM (98) in the null industry. This means that AMRX’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBFM’s over the last 12 months.
SBFM's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as AMRX (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew similarly to AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
| AMRX | SBFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 18 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMRX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SBFM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMRX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SBFM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMRX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBFM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMRX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SBFM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMRX (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -2.43% price change this week, while SBFM (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -9.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMRX is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
SBFM is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.33% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TOPT | 35.78 | 0.12 | +0.34% |
| iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) | |||
| EASY | 26.07 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Liberty One Defensive Dividend Growth ETF (EASY) | |||
| SDCP | 25.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Virtus Newfleet Short Duration Core Plus Bond ETF (SDCP) | |||
| ECOW | 26.71 | -0.06 | -0.22% |
| Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) | |||
| GRID | 179.79 | -4.52 | -2.45% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) | |||
AMRX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMRX has been loosely correlated with AMPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMRX jumps, then AMPH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMRX | 100% | -3.18% | ||
| AMPH - AMRX | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| VTRS - AMRX | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| TEVA - AMRX | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| ANIP - AMRX | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| COLL - AMRX | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||