It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RGLSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUAMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RGLSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAMY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.71% price change this week, while UAMY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +53.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.60%.
UAMY is expected to report earnings on Apr 07, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
RGLSF | UAMY | RGLSF / UAMY | |
Capitalization | 134M | 26.9M | 498% |
EBITDA | -2.57M | -3.16M | 81% |
Gain YTD | 61.452 | 622.892 | 10% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 98.04 | - |
Revenue | 0 | 8.45M | - |
Total Cash | 16.5M | 13.1M | 126% |
Total Debt | N/A | 242K | - |
RGLSF | UAMY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RGLSF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (96) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.
UAMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RGLSF (54) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.
RGLSF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (93) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.
UAMY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RGLSF (44) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.
UAMY's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGLSF (80) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew significantly faster than RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.
RGLSF | UAMY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 9 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RGLSF and MARIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGLSF and MARIF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGLSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RGLSF | 100% | -2.27% | ||
MARIF - RGLSF | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
UAMY - RGLSF | 32% Poorly correlated | -15.49% | ||
SRLZF - RGLSF | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.34% | ||
ILHMF - RGLSF | 28% Poorly correlated | +7.00% | ||
EROSF - RGLSF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that UAMY and RGLSF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UAMY and RGLSF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UAMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UAMY | 100% | -15.49% | ||
RGLSF - UAMY | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
WWR - UAMY | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.55% | ||
AAGFF - UAMY | 23% Poorly correlated | -12.47% | ||
CMP - UAMY | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.02% | ||
CCJ - UAMY | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.79% | ||
More |