Advertisement
RGLSF vs UAMY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLSF is a Hold and UAMY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RGLSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUAMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RGLSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UAMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RGLSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAMY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RGLSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UAMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.26% price change this week, while UAMY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +44.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +9.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +34.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +330.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
UAMY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+9.16% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| RGLSF | UAMY | RGLSF / UAMY | |
| Capitalization | 240M | 1.74B | 14% |
| EBITDA | -4.23M | -180.63K | 2,340% |
| Gain YTD | 42.857 | 609.605 | 7% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 25.7M | - |
| Total Cash | 9.31M | 6.97M | 134% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 973K | - |
RGLSF | UAMY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 33 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RGLSF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (96) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.
UAMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGLSF (55) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.
UAMY's SMR Rating (93) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RGLSF (95) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.
UAMY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RGLSF (45) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.
UAMY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGLSF (70) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.
| RGLSF | UAMY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 72% | 21 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
RGLSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RGLSF and UAMY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGLSF and UAMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGLSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGLSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| UAMY - RGLSF | 32% Poorly correlated | -8.72% | ||
| SRLZF - RGLSF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LQRCF - RGLSF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| AXVEF - RGLSF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KGLLF - RGLSF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
UAMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UAMY and LGO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UAMY and LGO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UAMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAMY | 100% | -8.72% | ||
| LGO - UAMY | 32% Poorly correlated | -8.33% | ||
| NB - UAMY | 32% Poorly correlated | -14.34% | ||
| RGLSF - UAMY | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NAK - UAMY | 30% Poorly correlated | -15.15% | ||
| MP - UAMY | 29% Poorly correlated | -6.69% | ||
More | ||||