RGLSF
Price
$1.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
133.61M
UAMY
Price
$3.87
Change
+$0.14 (+3.75%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
26.91M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGLSF vs UAMY

Header iconRGLSF vs UAMY Comparison
Open Charts RGLSF vs UAMYBanner chart's image
Regulus Resources
Price$1.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$283
Capitalization133.61M
United States Antimony
Price$3.87
Change+$0.14 (+3.75%)
Volume$11.03M
Capitalization26.91M
RGLSF vs UAMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UAMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLSF vs. UAMY commentary
Jul 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLSF is a StrongBuy and UAMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2025
Stock price -- (RGLSF: $1.77 vs. UAMY: $3.73)
Brand notoriety: RGLSF and UAMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLSF: 18% vs. UAMY: 175%
Market capitalization -- RGLSF: $133.61M vs. UAMY: $26.91M
RGLSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $133.61M. UAMY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $26.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUAMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UAMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UAMY is a better buy in the long-term than RGLSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGLSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAMY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGLSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UAMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UAMY is a better buy in the short-term than RGLSF.

Price Growth

RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while UAMY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +40.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

UAMY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.06% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLSF($134M) has a higher market cap than UAMY($26.9M). UAMY YTD gains are higher at: 110.734 vs. RGLSF (33.008). RGLSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.57M vs. UAMY (-3.16M). RGLSF has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. UAMY (13.1M). UAMY has higher revenues than RGLSF: UAMY (8.45M) vs RGLSF (0).
RGLSFUAMYRGLSF / UAMY
Capitalization134M26.9M498%
EBITDA-2.57M-3.16M81%
Gain YTD33.008110.73430%
P/E RatioN/A98.04-
Revenue08.45M-
Total Cash16.5M13.1M126%
Total DebtN/A242K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLSF vs UAMY: Fundamental Ratings
RGLSF
UAMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7315
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3422
SMR RATING
1..100
9190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
737
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLSF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (95) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RGLSF (34) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's SMR Rating (90) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RGLSF (91) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RGLSF (46) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGLSF (73) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew significantly faster than RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGLSFUAMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UAMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IONR3.220.32
+11.03%
ioneer Ltd
CKX12.290.41
+3.45%
CKX Lands
WTM1812.0034.00
+1.91%
White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd
LOMA10.530.09
+0.86%
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
E33.00-0.25
-0.75%
ENI SpA

RGLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGLSF and MARIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGLSF and MARIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLSF
1D Price
Change %
RGLSF100%
N/A
MARIF - RGLSF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
UAMY - RGLSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
SRLZF - RGLSF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LQRCF - RGLSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
AXVEF - RGLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UAMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UAMY and VZLA have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UAMY and VZLA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UAMY
1D Price
Change %
UAMY100%
-0.27%
VZLA - UAMY
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
RGLSF - UAMY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NB - UAMY
31%
Poorly correlated
-19.80%
SCCO - UAMY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
MP - UAMY
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
More