RGLSF
Price
$1.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
133.61M
UAMY
Price
$1.41
Change
+$0.11 (+8.46%)
Updated
Mar 11, 03:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.91M
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

RGLSF vs UAMY

Header iconRGLSF vs UAMY Comparison
Open Charts RGLSF vs UAMYBanner chart's image
Regulus Resources
Price$1.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$134
Capitalization133.61M
United States Antimony
Price$1.41
Change+$0.11 (+8.46%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization26.91M
RGLSF vs UAMY Comparison Chart
Loading...
UAMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLSF vs. UAMY commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLSF is a Hold and UAMY is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (RGLSF: $1.43 vs. UAMY: $1.30)
Brand notoriety: RGLSF and UAMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLSF: 4% vs. UAMY: 93%
Market capitalization -- RGLSF: $133.61M vs. UAMY: $26.91M
RGLSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $133.61M. UAMY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $26.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUAMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UAMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UAMY is a better buy in the long-term than RGLSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UAMY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UAMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.88% price change this week, while UAMY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

UAMY is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.27% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLSF($134M) has a higher market cap than UAMY($26.9M). RGLSF YTD gains are higher at: 7.519 vs. UAMY (-26.554). RGLSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.57M vs. UAMY (-3.16M). RGLSF has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. UAMY (13.1M). UAMY has higher revenues than RGLSF: UAMY (8.45M) vs RGLSF (0).
RGLSFUAMYRGLSF / UAMY
Capitalization134M26.9M498%
EBITDA-2.57M-3.16M81%
Gain YTD7.519-26.554-28%
P/E RatioN/A98.04-
Revenue08.45M-
Total Cash16.5M13.1M126%
Total DebtN/A242K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLSF vs UAMY: Fundamental Ratings
RGLSF
UAMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8169
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4456
SMR RATING
1..100
8690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8094
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
715
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLSF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (96) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (56) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (90) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Price Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (94) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGLSF (71) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew significantly faster than RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UAMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
UAMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPRY10.83-0.02
-0.18%
ARS Pharmaceuticals
GDHG1.07-0.03
-2.29%
Golden Heaven Group Holdings Ltd
DY136.75-4.21
-2.99%
Dycom Industries
IMMR7.57-0.28
-3.51%
Immersion Corp
FICO1695.35-138.78
-7.57%
Fair Isaac Corp

RGLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGLSF and MARIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGLSF and MARIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLSF
1D Price
Change %
RGLSF100%
N/A
MARIF - RGLSF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UAMY - RGLSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-9.72%
SRLZF - RGLSF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
ILHMF - RGLSF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EROSF - RGLSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
More

UAMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UAMY and RGLSF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UAMY and RGLSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UAMY
1D Price
Change %
UAMY100%
-9.72%
RGLSF - UAMY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TECK - UAMY
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.06%
WWR - UAMY
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.46%
LZM - UAMY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
AAGFF - UAMY
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.66%
More