RING
Price
$76.70
Change
-$2.39 (-3.02%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:23 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLVR
Price
$58.60
Change
-$1.32 (-2.20%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
762.48M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RING vs SLVR

RING vs SLVR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) vs. Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR)

Key Takeaways

  • RING provides focused exposure to global gold mining companies through a passive strategy tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners IMI Index, with approximately 40 holdings and a low expense ratio of 0.39%.
  • SLVR offers a hybrid approach combining silver mining equities and a physical silver allocation, tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners Index with around 80 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.65%.
  • Structural differences center on metal focus—gold for RING versus silver with physical backing for SLVR—leading to distinct risk profiles tied to each commodity's supply-demand dynamics.
  • Both ETFs target precious metals mining themes but differ in diversification, with RING emphasizing established gold producers and SLVR incorporating direct physical silver exposure.
  • Cost efficiency favors RING due to its lower expense ratio, while SLVR introduces unique physical commodity elements that may influence volatility and correlation patterns.
  • Relative positioning depends on investor views on gold versus silver price trends, mining sector margins, and broader commodity cycles in recent market environments.

Introduction

Investors seeking precious metals exposure often compare specialized mining ETFs to balance commodity price sensitivity with equity market participation. RING and SLVR do not compete directly but provide alternative pathways within the precious metals sector: one centered on gold miners and the other on silver miners augmented by physical holdings. This comparison highlights structural distinctions that can help investors align portfolios with specific commodity outlooks and risk tolerances amid evolving macroeconomic conditions.

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) Overview

The iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners IMI Index. The index focuses on global companies primarily engaged in gold mining, using a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with representative sampling. The ETF holds approximately 40 securities, with top positions typically including Newmont Corporation, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, and Barrick Gold Corporation. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly concentrated in materials, specifically gold mining activities exceeding 98% of assets. The expense ratio stands at 0.39%, reflecting its cost-efficient passive structure. Distinguishing features include a minimum holding threshold of around 30 securities and exclusions for companies with significant gold price hedging, promoting purer exposure to underlying metal prices.

Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) Overview

The Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) is a passively managed fund designed to track the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners Index. The strategy allocates the majority of assets to silver mining equities while incorporating a meaningful portion to physical silver, creating a blended exposure profile. The ETF maintains around 80 holdings, with top positions featuring silver-focused miners such as First Majestic Silver Corp. and physical silver vehicles like the Sprott Physical Silver Trust. Sector allocation centers on materials, with an emphasis on silver-related activities. The expense ratio is 0.65%. Key distinguishing features include the dedicated physical silver component, which differentiates it from pure equity miners ETFs and aims to capture both operational and direct commodity returns.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector operates within a complex environment shaped by gold and silver price movements, industrial demand for silver in electronics and solar energy, and macroeconomic factors including interest rates and inflation expectations. Capital flows into mining equities often respond to commodity trends, while regulatory developments around mining operations and environmental standards influence operational costs. Geopolitical tensions can support safe-haven demand for gold, whereas silver benefits from both monetary and industrial applications. Sector risks include cost inflation in extraction, reserve depletion, and sensitivity to global economic growth cycles that affect capital expenditure in mining projects.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, RING has exhibited amplified movements relative to gold prices due to its leveraged exposure through mining equities, with performance driven by producer margins and operational efficiency among top holdings. SLVR has shown distinct dynamics from its silver equity focus combined with physical allocation, potentially offering different volatility patterns tied to silver's dual role in monetary and industrial uses. Relative positioning reflects divergences in commodity-specific momentum, with gold miners often reacting to monetary policy signals and silver miners influenced by supply constraints and technological demand shifts over recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to RING due to its lower expense ratio, established passive replication of a broad gold miners index, and concentrated yet diversified holdings profile within the gold theme. SLVR offers differentiated silver exposure with physical elements that may appeal in specific commodity scenarios, though its higher cost structure and hybrid allocation introduce additional considerations around efficiency and trend consistency in prevailing market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
RING vs. SLVR commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RING is a Buy and SLVR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RING has more net assets: 2.37B vs. SLVR (762M). RING has a higher annual dividend yield than SLVR: RING (8.220) vs SLVR (7.384). RING was incepted earlier than SLVR: RING (15 years) vs SLVR (2 years). RING (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than SLVR (0.65). SLVR has a higher turnover RING (23.00) vs RING (23.00).
RINGSLVRRING / SLVR
Gain YTD8.2207.384111%
Net Assets2.37B762M311%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.6560%
Turnover23.0049.0047%
Yield1.424.3033%
Fund Existence15 years2 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RINGSLVR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLVR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JLPYX26.610.11
+0.42%
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus R6
FEMAX16.020.06
+0.38%
First Eagle U.S. SMID Cap Opportunity A
BTIIX178.93N/A
N/A
DWS Equity 500 Index Inst
WBSIX41.25N/A
N/A
William Blair Small Cap Growth I
VEUPX219.74N/A
N/A
Vanguard European Stock Instl Plus

RING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RING has been closely correlated with SSRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RING jumps, then SSRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RING
1D Price
Change %
RING100%
+1.23%
SSRM - RING
85%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
TXG - RING
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
CG - RING
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
AR - RING
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
RSG - RING
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More

SLVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVR has been closely correlated with SSRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLVR jumps, then SSRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVR
1D Price
Change %
SLVR100%
+0.13%
SSRM - SLVR
80%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
HYMC - SLVR
70%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
BRKHU - SLVR
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDE - SLVR
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
VZLA - SLVR
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
More