Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WDIAX
RLBGX vs WDIAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WDIAX
RLBGX vs WDIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WDIAX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Hold and WDIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WDIAX (93.2M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WDIAX: RLBGX (2.07) vs WDIAX (1.88). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WDIAX: RLBGX (17 years) vs WDIAX (27 years). WDIAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WDIAX (16.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDIAX: RLBGX (250) vs WDIAX (1000). WDIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.06 vs. RLBGX (17.12). WDIAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.63 vs. RLBGX (38.06).
| RLBGX | WDIAX | RLBGX / WDIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.75 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.36 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.549 | 13.214 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 93.2M | 309,013% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.88 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | 25.06 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.81 | 57.58 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.06 | 60.63 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.17 | 109.76 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement