Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WDIAX
RLBGX vs WDIAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WDIAX
RLBGX vs WDIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WDIAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WDIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. WDIAX (96.8M). RLBGX (2.08) and WDIAX (2.04) have matching dividends . RLBGX was incepted earlier than WDIAX: RLBGX (17 years) vs WDIAX (28 years). WDIAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WDIAX (12.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDIAX: RLBGX (250) vs WDIAX (1000). WDIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.87 vs. RLBGX (7.04). WDIAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.23 vs. RLBGX (33.43).
| RLBGX | WDIAX | RLBGX / WDIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.75 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.36 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.743 | 16.848 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 96.8M | 294,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 2.04 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 18.87 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.91 | 58.41 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.43 | 64.23 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.53 | 109.55 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement