Ad is loading...
RMEBX vs SLVCX
RMEBX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$17.06
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.17M
RMEBX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SLVCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. SLVCX (18.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMEBX (1.21) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SLVCX (26 years). SLVCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. SLVCX (-14.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. SLVCX (9.96).
| RMEBX | SLVCX | RMEBX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.87 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.87 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.203 | 3.659 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101B | 18.2M | 554,945% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | -14.27 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.77 | -3.30 | -508% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.02 | 9.96 | 552% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.89 | -17.60 | -335% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...