Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SLVCX
RMEBX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SLVCX
RMEBX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SLVCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. SLVCX (14.3M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMEBX (0.99) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SLVCX (28 years). SLVCX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SLVCX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. SLVCX (-18.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. SLVCX (-38.57).
| RMEBX | SLVCX | RMEBX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.77 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.77 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | -0.910 | -928% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 14.3M | 818,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | -18.28 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.88 | -13.95 | -250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.68 | -38.57 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.45 | -11.40 | -811% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement