Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SLVCX
RMEBX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SLVCX
RMEBX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SLVCX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SLVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. SLVCX (15.5M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMEBX (1.04) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SLVCX (27 years). SLVCX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SLVCX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. SLVCX (-10.19). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. SLVCX (-34.05).
| RMEBX | SLVCX | RMEBX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.77 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.77 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.242 | 3.771 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 15.5M | 754,839% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | -10.19 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.35 | -8.90 | -375% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.92 | -34.05 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.00 | -6.34 | -1,483% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement