Ad is loading...
RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.12
Change-$0.24 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.07B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$10.20
Change-$0.07 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.23M
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. SUVCX (241M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVCX (2.45) vs RMEBX (1.21). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. SUVCX (-9.50). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 61.16 vs. SUVCX (43.78).
| RMEBX | SUVCX | RMEBX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.46 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.938 | 1.383 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 241M | 42,739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 2.45 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.12 | -9.50 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.01 | -11.33 | -159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.16 | 43.78 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.50 | -21.43 | -282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...