Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$10.60
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.53M
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SUVCX (245M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVCX (2.30) vs RMEBX (1.11). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. SUVCX (-4.52). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.24 vs. SUVCX (26.30).
| RMEBX | SUVCX | RMEBX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.46 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.366 | 4.842 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 245M | 44,490% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 2.30 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | -4.52 | -233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.15 | -6.09 | -413% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.24 | 26.30 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.07 | -12.46 | -619% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers