Ad is loading...
RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$9.41
Change+$0.13 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.85M
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. SUVCX (220M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVCX (2.39) vs RMEBX (1.18). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.37) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. SUVCX (-17.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. SUVCX (22.02).
| RMEBX | SUVCX | RMEBX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.37 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.724 | -8.300 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.8B | 220M | 43,545% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 2.39 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.74 | -17.65 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.82 | -23.71 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.21 | 22.02 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.41 | -28.43 | -188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...