Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$10.41
Change+$0.10 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.25M
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SUVCX (239M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVCX (2.36) vs RMEBX (1.16). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. SUVCX (-7.87). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. SUVCX (13.54).
| RMEBX | SUVCX | RMEBX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.46 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.842 | 1.877 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 239M | 43,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 2.36 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | -7.87 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.32 | -14.97 | -116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.55 | 13.54 | 373% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.95 | -16.58 | -416% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement