Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVZX
RMEBX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$12.64
Change+$0.13 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.25M
RMEBX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVZX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SUVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SUVZX (239M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVZX (3.09) vs RMEBX (1.16). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SUVZX (24 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SUVZX (0.95). SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SUVZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. SUVZX (-4.35). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. SUVZX (26.95).
| RMEBX | SUVZX | RMEBX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.79 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.95 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.842 | 2.457 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 239M | 43,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 3.09 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | -4.35 | -204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.32 | -8.42 | -206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.55 | 26.95 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.95 | 1.19 | 5,782% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement