Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVZX
RMEBX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.60
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$12.85
Change+$0.13 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.98M
RMEBX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVZX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SUVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. SUVZX (242M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVZX (3.09) vs RMEBX (1.16). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SUVZX (24 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SUVZX (0.95). SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SUVZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. SUVZX (-2.09). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.71 vs. SUVZX (51.04).
| RMEBX | SUVZX | RMEBX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.79 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.95 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.315 | 4.177 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107B | 242M | 44,215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 3.09 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.50 | -2.09 | -453% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.88 | 2.23 | 1,159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.71 | 51.04 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.51 | 3.46 | 2,151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement