Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPFX vs ZGFIX
RNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPFX vs ZGFIX
RNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPFX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPFX is a Hold and ZGFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. ZGFIX (335M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: RNPFX (1.19) vs ZGFIX (0.73). RNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: RNPFX (24 years) vs ZGFIX (9 years). ZGFIX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFIX (14.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: RNPFX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.63 vs. ZGFIX (-4.56). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 18.29 vs. RNPFX (11.25).
| RNPFX | ZGFIX | RNPFX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.86 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.00 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.232 | -2.382 | -136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 335M | 50,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.73 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | -4.56 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.85 | 21.13 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.25 | 18.29 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement