| RW | TMFG | RW / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 2.519 | 5.304 | 47% |
| Net Assets | 17.6M | 359M | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.85 | 112% |
| Turnover | 187.00 | 15.00 | 1,247% |
| Yield | 0.10 | 0.26 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 12 years | - |
| RW | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 80% | 20 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RW and AME have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RW and AME's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| JLL - TMFG | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| PYPL - TMFG | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| PAYC - TMFG | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| MDT - TMFG | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| RMD - TMFG | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||