| RW | TMFG | RW / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | -2.073 | 2.566 | -81% |
| Net Assets | 16.1M | 343M | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.85 | 112% |
| Turnover | 187.00 | 15.00 | 1,247% |
| Yield | 0.10 | 0.26 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 12 years | - |
| RW | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 20 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RW and LOAR have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RW and LOAR's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| JLL - TMFG | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| PYPL - TMFG | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| PAYC - TMFG | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
| MDT - TMFG | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
| RMD - TMFG | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||