Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SPINX
RWMFX vs SPINX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SPINX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.04B
SEI S&P 500 Index A (SIIT)
Price$22.01
Change+$0.18 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.52B
RWMFX vs SPINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SPINX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a StrongBuy and SPINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. SPINX (4.52B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SPINX: RWMFX (1.43) vs SPINX (1.10). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SPINX: RWMFX (23 years) vs SPINX (12 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SPINX (0.12). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPINX: RWMFX (250) vs SPINX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. SPINX (-3.83). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. SPINX (28.42).
| RWMFX | SPINX | RWMFX / SPINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.05 | 620% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.12 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.213 | 11.460 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204B | 4.52B | 4,515% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.10 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | -3.83 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | 18.62 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.81 | 28.42 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.34 | 136.21 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement