Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SSAQX
RWMFX vs SSAQX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SSAQX
RWMFX vs SSAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SSAQX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SSAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SSAQX (4.17B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SSAQX: RWMFX (1.40) vs SSAQX (0.94). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SSAQX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SSAQX (46 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SSAQX (0.13). SSAQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). SSAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: SSAQX (0) vs RWMFX (250). SSAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.87 vs. RWMFX (8.54). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.09 vs. SSAQX (13.96).
| RWMFX | SSAQX | RWMFX / SSAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.13 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.13 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 46 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.080 | 6.860 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.17B | 5,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.94 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | 10.87 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 26.69 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.09 | 13.96 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.41 | 89.54 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement