Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SSAQX
RWMFX vs SSAQX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SSAQX
RWMFX vs SSAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SSAQX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SSAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SSAQX (4.16B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SSAQX: RWMFX (1.41) vs SSAQX (0.92). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SSAQX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SSAQX (47 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SSAQX (0.13). SSAQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). SSAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: SSAQX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.12 vs. SSAQX (1.62). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.51 vs. SSAQX (8.46).
| RWMFX | SSAQX | RWMFX / SSAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.13 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.13 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 47 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.229 | 8.858 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.16B | 5,238% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.92 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.12 | 1.62 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.81 | 29.46 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.51 | 8.46 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.14 | 84.90 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers