Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TMLCX
RWMFX vs TMLCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TMLCX
RWMFX vs TMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TMLCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and TMLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TMLCX (4.66B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TMLCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs TMLCX (0.53). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TMLCX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TMLCX (29 years). TMLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TMLCX (14.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLCX: RWMFX (250) vs TMLCX (100000). TMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.70 vs. RWMFX (2.09). TMLCX (28.35) and RWMFX (27.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RWMFX | TMLCX | RWMFX / TMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 9.958 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.66B | 4,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.53 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 11.70 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 39.57 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 28.35 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | 137.90 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement