Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TMLCX
RWMFX vs TMLCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TMLCX
RWMFX vs TMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TMLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and TMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. TMLCX (4.59B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TMLCX: RWMFX (1.44) vs TMLCX (0.60). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TMLCX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TMLCX (28 years). TMLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TMLCX (14.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLCX: RWMFX (250) vs TMLCX (100000). TMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. RWMFX (5.76). TMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.57 vs. RWMFX (28.02).
| RWMFX | TMLCX | RWMFX / TMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.858 | 9.195 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.59B | 4,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.60 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 17.83 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.17 | 36.68 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.02 | 29.57 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.65 | 137.42 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement