Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TMLCX
RWMFX vs TMLCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TMLCX
RWMFX vs TMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TMLCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and TMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. TMLCX (4.61B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TMLCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs TMLCX (0.60). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TMLCX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TMLCX (28 years). TMLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TMLCX (14.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLCX: RWMFX (250) vs TMLCX (100000). TMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. RWMFX (7.92). TMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.84 vs. RWMFX (26.49).
| RWMFX | TMLCX | RWMFX / TMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.991 | 8.762 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 4.61B | 4,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.60 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.92 | 22.95 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.64 | 43.07 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.49 | 31.84 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.15 | 138.60 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement