Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WSHCX
RWMFX vs WSHCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WSHCX
RWMFX vs WSHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WSHCX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and WSHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX (218B) and WSHCX (218B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RWMFX pays higher dividends than WSHCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs WSHCX (0.55). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WSHCX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WSHCX (25 years). WSHCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX (29.00) and WSHCX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWMFX (250) and WSHCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. WSHCX (10.11). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.15 vs. WSHCX (21.52).
| RWMFX | WSHCX | RWMFX / WSHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.30 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.30 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.052 | 5.592 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 218B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.55 | 257% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.31 | 10.11 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.43 | 27.05 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.15 | 21.52 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.48 | 77.70 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers