Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WTRCX
RWMFX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WTRCX
RWMFX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WTRCX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and WTRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WTRCX (3.83B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs WTRCX (0.00). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WTRCX (34 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WTRCX (24.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: RWMFX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. WTRCX (-0.42). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.09 vs. WTRCX (-21.50).
| RWMFX | WTRCX | RWMFX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.76 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.080 | 10.129 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.83B | 5,698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | -0.42 | -2,052% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 1.94 | 1,257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.09 | -21.50 | -140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.41 | 5.67 | 1,419% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement