Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WTRCX
RWMFX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WTRCX
RWMFX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WTRCX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and WTRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. WTRCX (3.75B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: RWMFX (1.44) vs WTRCX (0.00). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WTRCX (34 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). WTRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: RWMFX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. WTRCX (-7.36). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.21 vs. WTRCX (-27.84).
| RWMFX | WTRCX | RWMFX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.76 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.384 | 8.932 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 3.75B | 5,848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | -7.36 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.44 | -2.81 | -977% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.21 | -27.84 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.98 | 1.30 | 5,990% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement