Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMHX vs TMMAX
RWMHX vs TMMAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMHX vs TMMAX
RWMHX vs TMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMHX vs. TMMAX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMHX is a Hold and TMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TMMAX (561M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than TMMAX: RWMHX (1.33) vs TMMAX (0.91). RWMHX was incepted earlier than TMMAX: RWMHX (11 years) vs TMMAX (19 years). TMMAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). TMMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RWMHX (32.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMMAX: RWMHX (250) vs TMMAX (100000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.07 vs. TMMAX (-10.04). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 25.54 vs. TMMAX (-15.44).
| RWMHX | TMMAX | RWMHX / TMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.14 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.157 | 9.469 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 561M | 38,859% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.91 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.07 | -10.04 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.38 | -13.88 | -212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.54 | -15.44 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.02 | 24.29 | 334% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement