Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMHX vs TMMAX
RWMHX vs TMMAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMHX vs TMMAX
RWMHX vs TMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMHX vs. TMMAX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMHX is a Buy and TMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TMMAX (591M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than TMMAX: RWMHX (1.34) vs TMMAX (0.92). RWMHX was incepted earlier than TMMAX: RWMHX (11 years) vs TMMAX (19 years). TMMAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). TMMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RWMHX (32.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMMAX: RWMHX (250) vs TMMAX (100000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.04 vs. TMMAX (-8.88). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.37 vs. TMMAX (-15.67).
| RWMHX | TMMAX | RWMHX / TMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.14 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.858 | 10.404 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 591M | 36,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.92 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | -8.88 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.61 | -13.93 | -234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.37 | -15.67 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.35 | 21.77 | 374% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement