Advertisement
SBH vs WOOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBH is a Hold and WOOF is a Hold.
| SBH | WOOF | SBH / WOOF | |
| Capitalization | 1.49B | 702M | 213% |
| EBITDA | 414M | 326M | 127% |
| Gain YTD | 11.921 | -12.811 | -93% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.31 | 24.50 | 34% |
| Revenue | 3.73B | 5.97B | 63% |
| Total Cash | 173M | 293M | 59% |
| Total Debt | 1.52B | 2.82B | 54% |
SBH | WOOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 27 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WOOF's Valuation (33) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBH (66) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WOOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBH’s over the last 12 months.
WOOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as SBH (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WOOF’s stock grew similarly to SBH’s over the last 12 months.
SBH's SMR Rating (41) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WOOF (88) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than WOOF’s over the last 12 months.
SBH's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WOOF (78) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SBH’s stock grew similarly to WOOF’s over the last 12 months.
SBH's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WOOF (99) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than WOOF’s over the last 12 months.
| SBH | WOOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 25 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SBH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while WOOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SBH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WOOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SBH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SBH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WOOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SBH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -4.43% price change this week, while WOOF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -9.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -4.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
SBH is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
WOOF is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-4.09% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SBTU | 44.96 | 3.81 | +9.25% |
| T-REX 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | |||
| DBEZ | 62.31 | 0.50 | +0.80% |
| Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Eq ETF | |||
| IQDF | 35.92 | 0.24 | +0.69% |
| Northern Trust Intl Qual Div ETF | |||
| OCTH | 24.24 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF Oct | |||
| SRV | 46.75 | -0.85 | -1.79% |
| NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund | |||
SBH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBH has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBH jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.
WOOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WOOF has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WOOF jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WOOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOOF | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| HNST - WOOF | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| CPRT - WOOF | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| LE - WOOF | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| SBH - WOOF | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| FND - WOOF | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
More | ||||