SCHF
Price
$26.88
Change
+$0.37 (+1.40%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
63.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VT
Price
$150.84
Change
+$2.05 (+1.38%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
79.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHF vs VT

Header iconSCHF vs VT Comparison
Open Charts SCHF vs VTBanner chart's image
SCHF vs VT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) vs. Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT)

Key Takeaways

  • SCHF provides targeted exposure to developed markets ex-U.S. with ~1,500 holdings, while VT offers comprehensive global coverage including U.S. and emerging markets with ~10,000 holdings.
  • SCHF boasts a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to VT's 0.06%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term investors.
  • SCHF emphasizes financials (23%) and industrials (19%), whereas VT is tech-heavy (26%) due to significant U.S. large-cap influence.
  • Both are passive, market-cap-weighted index trackers with low turnover (SCHF ~5%, VT ~3%), promoting tax efficiency and structural stability.
  • SCHF suits investors seeking pure international diversification; VT appeals for one-stop global equity exposure.
  • In recent market cycles, international developed equities have shown relative strength amid U.S. concentration risks.

Introduction

In the evolving global equity landscape, comparing SCHF and VT helps investors weigh targeted international exposure against broad worldwide diversification. SCHF focuses on developed markets outside the U.S., capturing large- and mid-cap leaders in Europe, Asia, and elsewhere. VT, conversely, encompasses the entire investable universe, blending U.S. megacaps with international and emerging market stocks. These ETFs appeal to similar goals of equity growth but differ in geographic scope and risk profiles. Amid recent shifts toward international outperformance and concerns over U.S. market concentration, this ETF comparison highlights structural edges for portfolio positioning in sector rotation and macro trends.

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) Overview

The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) is a passive fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex US Index, targeting large- and mid-cap stocks in developed markets excluding the U.S., such as Japan, the UK, and South Korea. It holds approximately 1,498 securities, providing broad yet focused ex-U.S. exposure. Top holdings include Samsung Electronics (2.22%), ASML Holding NV (ASML) (1.99%), SK Hynix (1.29%), Novartis AG (1.09%), and Roche Holding Par AG (1.08%). Sector allocations feature financial services (~23%), industrials (~19%), technology (~13%), healthcare (~9%), and consumer cyclical (~8%). With an ultralow expense ratio of 0.03% and portfolio turnover around 5%, SCHF emphasizes cost efficiency and minimal trading. Its structure supports high liquidity, evidenced by tight bid-ask spreads (~0.04%), making it ideal for core international satellite allocations.

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) Overview

The Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) passively replicates the FTSE Global All Cap Index, delivering market-cap-weighted exposure to over 10,000 stocks across developed, emerging, and U.S. markets—covering ~98% of global investable equity. Top holdings are dominated by U.S. giants: NVDA (NVIDIA Corp., 4.11%), AAPL (Apple Inc., 3.47%), MSFT (Microsoft Corp., 2.93%), AMZN (Amazon.com Inc., 2.11%), and Alphabet Class A (1.81%). Sectors skew toward technology (~26%), financial services (~17%), industrials (~12%), consumer cyclical (~10%), and healthcare (~9%). VT's expense ratio is 0.06%, with low turnover (~3%) ensuring tax efficiency. This all-in-one structure suits investors seeking simplified global equity without rebalancing needs.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Global equities navigate a resilient growth environment, with developed international markets benefiting from earnings acceleration, attractive valuations relative to the U.S., and potential U.S. dollar softening. Macro drivers include central bank easing, AI broadening beyond U.S. tech, and cyclical recovery in Europe and Japan. Capital flows have shifted toward ex-U.S. developed stocks amid U.S. concentration risks in megacaps. Emerging markets within VT add growth via policy reforms but introduce volatility from geopolitics and commodities. Sector rotation favors SCHF's financials and industrials amid rising global activity, while regulatory scrutiny on U.S. tech tempers VT's heavy weighting. Risks encompass policy uncertainty and uneven recovery, underscoring diversification value.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SCHF has demonstrated resilience through international developed strength, often outperforming broader global benchmarks during U.S.-led pullbacks. VT's performance mirrors global trends but reflects U.S. megacap volatility, with higher exposure amplifying tech-driven swings. Relative positioning shows SCHF's lower volatility from balanced sectors versus VT's concentration risk. Over recent months, ex-U.S. developed equities gained traction amid sector rotation into value-oriented financials and industrials, contrasting VT's growth tilt. Interest rate expectations and commodity uptrends support SCHF's cyclical leanings, while geopolitical stability bolsters both amid macro shifts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots analyzing thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following or mean reversion, and performance metrics including win rates and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, helping traders identify momentum in equities, ETFs, or forex. Users can deploy these bots for automated signals or pattern recognition, adapting to volatility in global markets. Explore the page to integrate AI-driven insights into your ETF strategy today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SCHF for its superior cost efficiency (0.03% expense ratio), purer developed ex-U.S. diversification amid international momentum, and balanced sector profile reducing U.S.-centric risks. VT's broader scope suits global purists, but SCHF edges on relative positioning and structural value in recent cycles. Probabilistic edge to SCHF at 60-65% based on trend consistency and exposure dynamics—not investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SCHF vs. VT commentary
Apr 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHF is a Hold and VT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VT has more net assets: 79.2B vs. SCHF (63.4B). SCHF has a higher annual dividend yield than VT: SCHF (11.814) vs VT (6.996). SCHF was incepted earlier than VT: SCHF (16 years) vs VT (18 years). SCHF (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than VT (0.06). SCHF has a higher turnover VT (3.00) vs VT (3.00).
SCHFVTSCHF / VT
Gain YTD11.8146.996169%
Net Assets63.4B79.2B80%
Total Expense Ratio0.030.0650%
Turnover4.003.00133%
Yield3.401.82187%
Fund Existence16 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHFVT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHC51.000.82
+1.63%
Schwab International Small-Cap Eq ETF™
FISR25.890.11
+0.43%
State Street® Fixed Inc Sect RotationETF
TMSF50.320.14
+0.28%
T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF
BLKC20.63N/A
N/A
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF
FLLA30.28-0.03
-0.10%
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF

SCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHF
1D Price
Change %
SCHF100%
+1.40%
STM - SCHF
79%
Closely correlated
+6.37%
SAN - SCHF
70%
Closely correlated
+4.72%
MT - SCHF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.81%
BNT - SCHF
67%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
BMO - SCHF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
More