SCHG
Price
$35.53
Change
-$0.31 (-0.86%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
63.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TCHP
Price
$50.85
Change
+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
2.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHG vs TCHP

SCHG vs TCHP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) vs. T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP)

Key Takeaways

  • SCHG is a passively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while TCHP is an actively managed ETF pursuing a blue-chip growth strategy.
  • SCHG offers significantly lower costs with a 0.04% expense ratio compared to TCHP’s 0.57% expense ratio, providing a clear structural advantage for long-term cost efficiency.
  • SCHG maintains broader diversification with approximately 196 holdings, whereas TCHP is more concentrated with around 67 holdings and higher weightings in its top positions.
  • Both ETFs exhibit substantial exposure to technology and communication services sectors, driven by overlapping top holdings such as NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, though TCHP shows greater concentration in mega-cap names.
  • SCHG provides index-based rebalancing with lower turnover, while TCHP relies on active management decisions that can lead to higher portfolio turnover and distinct risk profiles.
  • In the current large-cap growth environment, SCHG emphasizes cost-effective, rules-based exposure, whereas TCHP seeks to add value through selective stock picking within similar thematic areas.

Introduction

Investors seeking large-cap growth exposure often evaluate passive index trackers alongside actively managed strategies. The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and the T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) both target established U.S. companies with strong growth characteristics, yet they employ fundamentally different approaches. SCHG delivers broad, low-cost replication of a growth index, while TCHP applies active management to select blue-chip growth names. Comparing these ETFs highlights trade-offs in cost, diversification, and strategy that remain relevant amid ongoing sector rotation and interest-rate expectations within the growth equity space.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Overview

The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. The fund holds approximately 196 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.04%. Top holdings typically include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and GOOGL, with the portfolio heavily weighted toward technology, communication services, consumer cyclical, and healthcare sectors. As a rules-based index fund, SCHG rebalances periodically according to index methodology, offering investors transparent, low-turnover exposure to large-cap growth equities.

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) Overview

The T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an actively managed ETF that seeks long-term capital growth by investing in established large- and mid-cap companies demonstrating above-average growth and profitability. The fund holds approximately 67 securities and carries an expense ratio of 0.57%. Its top holdings often feature elevated concentrations in names such as NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, AMZN, and GOOG, resulting in significant technology and communication services exposure. TCHP’s active approach allows portfolio managers to adjust holdings based on fundamental analysis, producing a more concentrated profile than many passive growth peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the large-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity market, where technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary sectors dominate. Macroeconomic drivers such as artificial intelligence adoption, earnings growth among mega-cap technology companies, and evolving interest-rate expectations continue to shape capital flows into growth equities. Regulatory developments around antitrust and data privacy, alongside broader sector rotation between growth and value styles, influence positioning. Risks include valuation sensitivity to rate changes and concentration in a limited number of high-performing names, which can amplify volatility during shifts in investor sentiment or economic conditions.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have benefited from strength in technology and growth-oriented mega-cap stocks, though their responses to sector rotations and earnings seasons differ. SCHG’s broader holdings and lower expense ratio have supported more consistent participation in broad growth rallies with reduced cost drag. TCHP’s active concentration has produced differentiated results during periods when manager selections outperformed or underperformed the index, often reflecting higher volatility tied to its top holdings. Relative positioning highlights SCHG’s emphasis on diversified, cost-efficient exposure versus TCHP’s pursuit of potential alpha through selective overweighting in favored growth names.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probability to the Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across holdings, and rules-based methodology that reduces manager risk. While the T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) offers active flexibility and potential for outperformance through concentrated bets, its higher costs and narrower profile introduce greater relative risk in most market environments. Investors should evaluate these characteristics against their own objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 32.8B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 2.19B to 63.41B. SCHG holds the highest valuation in this group at 63.41B. The lowest valued company is TCHP at 2.19B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -0%, and the average quarterly price growth was 13%. TCHP experienced the highest price growth at 0%, while SCHG experienced the biggest fall at -1%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 27%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was -20% and the average quarterly volume growth was 396,929%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
SCHG vs. TCHP commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Buy and TCHP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 63.4B vs. TCHP (2.19B). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than TCHP: SCHG (9.167) vs TCHP (1.986). SCHG was incepted earlier than TCHP: SCHG (17 years) vs TCHP (6 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than TCHP (0.57). SCHG has a higher turnover TCHP (15.80) vs TCHP (15.80).
SCHGTCHPSCHG / TCHP
Gain YTD9.1671.986462%
Net Assets63.4B2.19B2,899%
Total Expense Ratio0.040.577%
Turnover27.0015.80171%
Yield0.370.00-
Fund Existence17 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHGTCHP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TCHP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LTTI17.430.03
+0.16%
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
XDSQ44.78-0.10
-0.23%
Innovator US Eq Acltd ETF™ Quarterly
LGLV185.48-1.28
-0.69%
State Street® SPDR®USLrgCapLowVolIdxETF
IFLO37.40-0.27
-0.73%
VictoryShares Intl Free Csh Flow ETF
SHRY47.76-0.49
-1.02%
First Trust Bloomberg Shld Yld ETF

SCHG and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with XPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then XPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHG
1D Price
Change %
SCHG100%
-0.86%
XPO - SCHG
72%
Closely correlated
+4.49%
NXPI - SCHG
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
KKR - SCHG
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
XYZ - SCHG
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
CVNA - SCHG
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More

TCHP and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCHP has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TCHP jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCHP
1D Price
Change %
TCHP100%
+0.06%
TSM - TCHP
68%
Closely correlated
+2.85%
GS - TCHP
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
CVNA - TCHP
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
MS - TCHP
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
MRVL - TCHP
52%
Loosely correlated
+7.05%
More