SCHG
Price
$35.83
Change
+$0.51 (+1.44%)
Updated
Sep 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
62.47B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VOOG
Price
$84.13
Change
+$0.63 (+0.75%)
Updated
Sep 3, 10:56 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
26.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHG vs VOOG

SCHG vs VOOG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) vs. Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs provide passive exposure to large-cap U.S. growth stocks but track different indexes, resulting in variations in holdings count, sector concentration, and top-position weighting.
  • SCHG maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared with 0.07% for VOOG, offering a modest long-term cost advantage.
  • SCHG holds approximately 197 securities versus roughly 154 in VOOG, providing marginally broader diversification within the growth style.
  • VOOG exhibits higher concentration in information technology, typically exceeding 50% of assets, while SCHG allocates closer to 44-46% to the sector.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, though individual weights differ and influence relative performance across market cycles.
  • Both funds employ full-replication strategies with low turnover, positioning them as core holdings for investors seeking growth-oriented large-cap equity exposure.

Introduction

Investors frequently compare large-cap growth ETFs to balance cost, diversification, and sector exposure within the same investment style. SCHG and VOOG compete directly in this category, delivering passive access to U.S. companies characterized by above-average earnings growth potential. While both target similar investor objectives, structural differences in index methodology create distinct exposure profiles that can affect performance across varying market environments.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Overview

SCHG seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. The fund holds approximately 197 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.04%. Its top holdings typically include NVDA (around 10-11%), AAPL (around 9%), MSFT (around 6%), AMZN, and AVGO. Sector allocations feature information technology at approximately 44-46%, communication services near 13%, consumer discretionary around 11%, and health care near 9%. The ETF uses a passive, market-cap-weighted approach with quarterly rebalancing aligned to the index.

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) Overview

VOOG tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index through full replication. The fund contains roughly 154 holdings and carries an expense ratio of 0.07%. Leading positions often feature NVDA (around 13-14%), MSFT (around 8%), AAPL (around 6%), AVGO, and GOOGL. Information technology comprises about 52% of assets, communication services near 15-16%, consumer discretionary around 8-9%, and financials near 9%. Like SCHG, VOOG follows a passive, market-cap-weighted methodology with periodic index-aligned adjustments.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Large-cap growth equities remain influenced by technological innovation, corporate earnings expansion in mega-capitalization companies, and shifts in interest-rate expectations. Capital continues to flow toward sectors demonstrating durable revenue growth, particularly those tied to artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital infrastructure. Macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and monetary policy can amplify or moderate volatility in growth-oriented portfolios. Regulatory developments in technology and competition policy represent ongoing considerations for both funds.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have benefited from strength in technology and communication services, though differences in sector weighting and concentration have produced varying relative results. VOOG’s heavier technology allocation has contributed to distinct performance patterns during periods of semiconductor and software outperformance, while SCHG’s broader holdings base has moderated volatility in certain rotations. Earnings cycles among top holdings and expectations around interest rates have served as primary drivers of short- and intermediate-term positioning differences.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability to SCHG. The combination of a lower expense ratio, modestly broader diversification across holdings, and comparable access to large-cap growth characteristics supports this assessment in the prevailing environment of cost sensitivity and sector momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SCHG vs. VOOG commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Hold and VOOG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 62.5B vs. VOOG (26.1B). VOOG has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: VOOG (12.798) vs SCHG (8.522). SCHG was incepted earlier than VOOG: SCHG (17 years) vs VOOG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than VOOG (0.07). SCHG has a higher turnover VOOG (20.00) vs VOOG (20.00).
SCHGVOOGSCHG / VOOG
Gain YTD8.52212.79867%
Net Assets62.5B26.1B239%
Total Expense Ratio0.040.0757%
Turnover27.0020.00135%
Yield0.370.4583%
Fund Existence17 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHGVOOG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
84%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VOOG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KFEB31.320.18
+0.57%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Feb
TXUG27.160.11
+0.42%
Thornburg International Growth ETF
ZAUG27.830.05
+0.18%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrAug
IBTM22.25N/A
+0.02%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Trs ETF
HGER35.53-0.02
-0.06%
Harbor Commodity All-Weather StrategyETF