Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCINX vs TRIGX
SCINX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts SCINX vs TRIGX
SCINX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCINX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCINX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. SCINX (574M). SCINX (2.50) and TRIGX (2.38) have matching dividends . SCINX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: SCINX (73 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). SCINX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). SCINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). SCINX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SCINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.98 vs. TRIGX (31.85). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.13 vs. SCINX (62.82).
| SCINX | TRIGX | SCINX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.81 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.81 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 73 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.348 | 11.775 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 574M | 16.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 2.38 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.98 | 31.85 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.47 | 88.48 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.82 | 89.13 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.50 | 167.74 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement