Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCINX vs TRIGX
SCINX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts SCINX vs TRIGX
SCINX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCINX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCINX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. SCINX (606M). SCINX (2.39) and TRIGX (2.29) have matching dividends . SCINX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: SCINX (73 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). SCINX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). SCINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). SCINX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SCINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.50 vs. TRIGX (32.40). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.37 vs. SCINX (71.32).
| SCINX | TRIGX | SCINX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.81 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.81 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 73 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.081 | 15.770 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 606M | 17B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 2.29 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.50 | 32.40 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.35 | 85.84 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.32 | 99.37 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 161.41 | 160.35 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement