It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SEED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SEED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
SEED (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -8.28% price change this week, while UAN (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.54%.
UAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
SEED | UAN | SEED / UAN | |
Capitalization | 25.5M | 831M | 3% |
EBITDA | 6.17M | 281M | 2% |
Gain YTD | -5.333 | 24.253 | -22% |
P/E Ratio | 3.25 | 4.83 | 67% |
Revenue | 72.3M | 681M | 11% |
Total Cash | 14.4M | 45.3M | 32% |
Total Debt | 139M | 550M | 25% |
SEED | UAN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UAN's Valuation (6) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as SEED (15) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that UAN’s stock grew similarly to SEED’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEED (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that UAN’s stock grew significantly faster than SEED’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's SMR Rating (51) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEED (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that UAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEED’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as SEED (64) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that UAN’s stock grew similarly to SEED’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEED (80) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that UAN’s stock grew significantly faster than SEED’s over the last 12 months.
SEED | UAN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago83% | 13 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago87% | 4 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that UAN and MOS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UAN and MOS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UAN | 100% | +1.37% | ||
MOS - UAN | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
NTR - UAN | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
RKDA - UAN | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
CF - UAN | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
YARIY - UAN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
More |